More explicitly, what I'm asking each SG to do during their
deliberations/voting on this is to note all the candidates that have at least
some support from their SG so the option below can be considered by the
Council.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AoC
Reveiw Team Re-do...
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
Date:
Mon, March 08, 2010 1:36 pm
To: "GNSO Council "
<council@gnso.icann.org>
Given what Janis and Peter said during
the AoC Q&A this morning
including the fact that the review team will
be larger than first
proposed, we should re-think our endorsement process
and only be
considering who if any of the twelve we do not endorse and
submit the
rest.
I think this should be kept simple. If any of the
candidates have
endorsement of at least one SG they are included. The
names would be
submitted showing the SG(s) endorsement. This only
slightly changes what
the SG are required to do (reverses it), and
resolves the gender and
geographic issues since it leaves it to Janis and
Peter to sort out.
This also gives the most number of candidates an
opportunity to be
considered and give the GNSO the best shot at being
fully represented on
the RT.
Tim