In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible deliverables and courses of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made during today's discussion, viz., that the GNSO Council consider circulating a brief statement to the ICANN community, stating its support for the work being done by the JAS WG and reiterating the importance of the issues they are considering.


 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@cctld.ru>
To: "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@ausregistry.com.au>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Date: 6/18/2011 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan

I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial.  Or there will be always a workaround for "endless discussion".  

 

--andrei

 

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan

 

As I discussed in the Working Session today.

 

The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them);

 

-          Stephane speaking directly to the Board

-          Katim’s email and the issues of the JAS WG

o   Processes within the Council

-          The future of Cross Community Working Groups

o   Publishing of reports etc

-          The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal processes and representation

o   Multi stakeholder make up

o   Differing views/ differing

 

It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of action in order to promote resolution.

 

Adrian Kinderis