Hello Ayden, As I understand there is a Public Comments phase later in the document itself, but what I this is warring is a growing pattern of the loss of transparency around Public Consultations. There should be a single, transparent (visible answers) source of info for all initiatives (blogs, direct surveys e.t.c.) tied with the webpage for Public Comments. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)
On 28 Jul 2019, at 18:36, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have just stumbled across this webpage and discovered that there is currently a community consultation underway (since 9 July) on the future of the NextGen@ICANN program. This consultation opportunity is NOT listed on the ICANN public comments page.
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/nextgen-community-consultation-2019-07... <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/nextgen-community-consultation-2019-07-09-en>
I was wondering if there was a desire for the GNSO Council to respond to this consultation. If so, I would like to express my interest in joining the drafting team for our comment. Thanks.
Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.