-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Bruce, Thank you for informing us of this reconsideration request. It is a surprise to me that NCSG has signed on to this request. I have asked the NCSG policy committee for some information about when we may have made the decision to be included in this filling. I certainly believe there are issues to be discussed, and I do believe this is an occasion where a second comment period may have been warranted, but I also question the process under which this was decided and filed in the name of the NCSG. avri On 30-Aug-14 06:09, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello All,
I note that a reconsideration request has been lodged regarding the accountability plan:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-38-2014-08-29-en
See attached for a copy.
The request is on behalf of the:
- The Business Constituency;
- The Registries Stakeholder Group; and
- The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG)
Regardless of the formal consideration of this request, I remain open to hearing from any parts of the GNSO on how they would like to see the current accountability plan changed. I am happy to participate in a teleconference with any of the GNSO constituencies or stakeholder groups.
The ICANN staff have scheduled a meeting for:
Date: 2 September 2014
Location: ICEC in the Topkapi A Room, Istanbul, Turkey
Time: 06:00-07:30 UTC
I won't be at that meeting, but will be interested to follow what is said at that meeting by the community.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAVEtAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HkDIH/iM61lV8OcGVeGM0TDBqU5v+ jMtoxG0/sXRcdgmXy6NKScnOR8W4L10xOAKr3Kod3TOBsrRE3vXeYje5qkw7VeN4 TgtL6IRXazKgerWFSYmQFKPGrWuBvrTXhdQIk1blNbjyK3UglUSmrqiNRPelJBc8 vTZFPprBwvsZ/Kt2Ubo0R9zJl2I7fBPkHbcve7LMDeYlhPR+U9TTirO8o+d3Rm5K 4A7SCeVtTTrLYjgP9V9A3q45a26pr4pZwxhQdIq2v3EdwK/NXQo/9hQc1jf8uJvT 7UY9SWrMIcnhCauRCO0CWa2z6dFJCGg/dKAqXG9MY04octJFuWfCY5+p3Kol/wQ= =70Hm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----