I am not sure to what end?

Why would we discuss this?

Haven’t we already got a full agenda? Why is this particular letter so important. I am not convinced the GNSO Council is in a position to respond nor assist here...

Adrian Kinderis

 

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu
Sent: Friday, 17 June 2011 5:45 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

 

Despite the unfortunate timing (16 June) I think this is an important development and support discussing it on Saturday. We may need to have a follow up discussion, but it would be good to have at least an initial conversation as soon as possible.


Cheers

Mary

 

Mary W S Wong

Professor of Law

Chair, Graduate IP Programs

Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584

>>>

From:

Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>

To:

GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>

Date:

6/17/2011 5:40 AM

Subject:

[council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Councillors,

 

For those of you that haven't seen this, here is a link to the letter NTIA has sent to ICANN re the new gTLD program.

 

 

This is one of the topics that we could discuss during our Saturday morning session, if there is interest in doing so.

 

Stéphane