-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>
Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:14 pm
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>, "GNSO Council "
<council@gnso.icann.org>
How much is "some support"?
Chuck
More explicitly, what I'm asking each SG to do during their deliberations/voting on this is to note all the candidates that have at least some support from their SG so the option below can be considered by the Council.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 1:36 pm
To: "GNSO Council " <council@gnso.icann.org>
Given what Janis and Peter said during the AoC Q&A this morning
including the fact that the review team will be larger than first
proposed, we should re-think our endorsement process and only be
considering who if any of the twelve we do not endorse and submit the
rest.
I think this should be kept simple. If any of the candidates have
endorsement of at least one SG they are included. The names would be
submitted showing the SG(s) endorsement. This only slightly changes what
the SG are required to do (reverses it), and resolves the gender and
geographic issues since it leaves it to Janis and Peter to sort out.
This also gives the most number of candidates an opportunity to be
considered and give the GNSO the best shot at being fully represented on
the RT.
Tim