Another wonderful consequence of governments, IGOs, operating their own sTLD would be that they can then "work between themselves" on how to resolve the obvious ambiguities of the likes of "Paris", France and "Paris", Texas - let alone the reduction of names to acronyms! Grant Forsyth Manager Industry & Regulatory Affairs TelstraClear Cnr Taharoto & Northcote Roads Private Bag 92143 AUCKLAND ph +64 9 912 5759 fx + 64 9 912 4077 Mb 029 912 5759 -----Original Message----- From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 03 December, 2004 21:01 To: alick.wilson@xendra.co.nz; paul.verhoef@icann.org; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: jeffrey@icann.org; Grant.Forsyth@team.telstraclear.co.nz; grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz Subject: RE: [council] WIPO-II Certainly it could be interesting to consider a new sponsored TLD space for IGOs, but I am thinking that .int is that space, isn't it? I also think from my conversations with some of those who have positions regarding this issue that they are viewing the igo name as what I might view the trademark of a famous and well known brand of a multi national company. That is, they are asking for their "name" in any gTLD. I am not sure that a new sponsored TLD would be be responsive to their The situation today is that a famous and well known brand holder registers, or defends their brand, in the TLDs where they veiw it important and relevant to do so. The value of sponsored TLDs is that since it is a "defined" space, it is not allowed for those who do not fit the "sponsorship criteria" to register. Thus, if a space is focused on international organizations, with some definition of that, only international organizations who meet that criteria. can register. I am under the impression that only international organizations with certain standing can register in the int. That sounds like a "sponsored" TLD, functionally, at least.
From: Alick Wilson <alick.wilson@xendra.co.nz> Reply-To: alick.wilson@xendra.co.nz To: "'Paul Verhoef'" <paul.verhoef@icann.org>, council@gnso.icann.org CC: "'John Jeffrey'" <jeffrey@icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] WIPO-II Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:48:00 +1300
Colleagues, I wonder if there is a case to be made for new sTLDs for international intergovernmental organizations (say .igo) and countries (say
.country)?
While these would not deal directly with offending sites in the rest of the
gTLD namespace, it would at least provide a single official address for IGOs and countries.
The concept could, of course, be extended to other sensitive types of name.
Am I right off track or does this have some merit?
Alick
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Verhoef Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2004 10:41 p.m. To: council@gnso.icann.org Cc: 'John Jeffrey' Subject: [council] WIPO-II
All,
Please find enclosed the letter and its annex from WIPO that we received last week.
I understand there were some technical issues with getting it on the web-site but as soon as these are arranged it will go up, hopefully already
today. I would like to offer my excuses for that.
regards
Paul
<<...>> <<...>>
____________________________________ Paul Verhoef Vice President Policy Development Support ICANN 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel.: +32.2.234 7872 Fax: +32.2.234 7848 <http://www.icann.org> www.icann.org