Stephane,
I think it is up to us to finalize the details.
Hopefully our discussion today will get us moving on that.
The proposed plan on the table now calls for the election
of vice chairs before the election of chair. If the vice chairs are
ineligible for the chair position, then that eliminates two presumably viable
candidates for chair; that could make it harder to elect a chair. So it
has been suggested that the vice chairs should be eligible for the chair
position and if one of them is elected as chair, then a new vice chair would
need to be elected by the affected House.
Chuck
Thanks for the document Chuck.
I seem to
remember a while back you asking whether the vice-chairs, once elected, would
be eligible to run for chair.
Has this been answered?
It would
seem not to make much sense to me, as all 3 positions are crucial to the
Council’s day-to-day operational capacity, to have 2 of the 3 positions held
by the same person...
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 03/09/09
17:01, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@verisign.com> a
écrit :
Thanks to Avri for pointing out some date errors in the document
I sent yesterday. A corrected, redlined version is
attached.
Chuck
From: Gomes,
Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:52
PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Council Transition
Plan for Bicameral Council Seats
I would like to submit the attached draft plan for
discussion in our Council meeting tomorrow under
"Item 9: Schedule/Actions leading up and
for Seoul".
Chuck