Thank you, Marika. I have attached a very light redline to soften some of the wording that I thought could create a misunderstanding about what the Discussion Group is doing. As background for those not involved, we have used the Discussion Group simply to raise issues, not to think about solutions or policy recommendations. Any member of the group can raise an issue for inclusion, and we are not trying to reach consensus on what issues should be addressed or the possible policy outcomes. So I have recommended changing phrases such as “the DG is expressing concern….” to something like the “DG has raised the issue of….” because while one person may be concerned, I think it’s too much to say that the group as a whole has that concern.

Overall, it’s an excellent letter and a fair summary of the DG discussions to date, but I would be more comfortable with the revisions attached. Thank you again, and please let me know if anyone has questions about this.

Bret

Bret Fausett, Esq. • General Counsel, Uniregistry, Inc.
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200 • Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
310-496-5755 (T) • 310-985-1351 (M) • bret@uniregistry.link, bret@nic.sexy
— — — — —