Thanks Keith. I like it too (would consider changing “forward to receipt” of the last paragraph into “forward to the receipt” or “to receiving” but it’s not worth an attached marked-up :). As a side note, I was wondering whether such a formal feedback from SSAC (report, with clearly a call/need for council to respond)) would have been necessary, had the activities of the last few months/meetings been help f2f. Part of this seems to be/me clarifications regarding what is expected from a PDP beyond its strict chartering language, and it might have been cleared out or at least softened, with the help of an informal f2f exchange. Maybe. As you said during the plenary, the GNSO WGs are doing really well in this context, but at the margin, call and exploder list based work eventually tend to generate inpust in written form that may come across as blunter than necessary (or maybe intended I don’t know). It’s probably stating the obvious but we may want to keep this in mind when we receive/respond to such communications. Thanks again for putting this together. (apologies for reposting - something wrong with my earlier “reply to all”) Regards, Philippe From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith via council Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 8:23 AM To: Drazek, Keith Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Response to SAC111 Hi all, This is a reminder we need to finalize this letter. If anyone has suggested edits, please respond by next Tuesday, June 30 so we can deliver by the end of next week. I’ll note we have several indications of support for the draft as circulated. Thanks in advance. Regards, Keith On Jun 19, 2020, at 2:51 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote: Hi all, Please find attached a draft GNSO Council response to SAC111. Please let me know if you have any feedback. This draft focuses on the process management aspects of SAC111 and not the substantive comments on the EPDP Phase 2 work. Thanks and regards, Keith <GNSO Council Response to SAC111 - Draft 19JUNE2020.docx> _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DCfFeXYP6Z24PqxMKz-FR4mMYk-h_GDMbI5v9fm4JLw7HF... _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KpEEi2I2hHRuOAzww556ScRwmzJdIgKyTEy0VmUqAEp5dw...) and the website Terms of Service (https://secure-web.cisco.com/1sbcfUDPRMHo6-NsGLvu8ZzGvDNb4OGDMMrkJAHOZrvO4e3...). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.