Hi
all
I also thought we
were clear that the extended review is an exception not the
norm
Perhaps we should
review actual requests over the next 6 months to see whether further
clarification of guidelines is warranted
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary
Sinclair
Managing Director,
ATUG
Chairman,
INTUG
T: +61 2
94958901 F: +61 2 94193889
M: +61
413734490
Email:
rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au
Skype:
rasinclair
Please visit the ATUG
website for Updates and Information www.atug.com.au
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, 9 July 2010 8:16
AM
To: KnobenW@telekom.de;
council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Motion on New gTLD
Recommendation
Wolf,
Speaking in my
personal capacity, I do not understand the concerns. Extended review is
by its design an exception procedure; an applicant would have to request it
for it to happen on a given application. It would then be the
responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that there was not a problem of
detrimental confusing similarity.
Before
considering additional work for an already overworked GNSO, it would sure help
to understand what the ISPCP issues are. What you say below gives no
clue about them.
Chuck
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@telekom.de
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:00
PM
To:
council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Motion on New gTLD
Recommendation
Dear councillors,
after
repeated discussion the ISPCP constituency still has the following concerns
regarding the letter to be sent to Kurt Pritz.
We
understand that there are examples of string similarity which would not
necessarily would cause detrimental confusion and that in this case - and only
in this - an extended review should be granted to the
applicant.
However
strict rules must be set under which the extended review is permitted ensuring
the string similarity review is the normal case and the extended one an
exception. These rules are to be worked out with participation of the
community.
The
letter should express that the rules must immediately be worked out by a small
expert group in order to achieve community
acceptance.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich