I have nothing to oppose. Many times these last minute items are urgent but not important, as I thik is the case now.

If it were important and deserved thoughtful consideration I think many voices would come up to oppose this inclusion.

By the way, as a non English speaker, I do oppose the abuse of acronyms such as AOB.

Just kidding J. Never mind. I can perfectly understand:

AOB	Annals of Botany
AOB	Algemene Onderwijsbond
AOB	Any Other Business
AOB	Association of Brewers
AOB	Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria
AOB	Ace of Base (band)
AOB	Assignment of Benefits
AOB	At or Below (aviation)
AOB	Alcohol On Breath
AOB	Air Order of Battle
AOB	Annual Operating Budget
AOB	Astronomical Observatory, Belgrade
AOB	Angle Of Bank
AOB	advanced operations base (US DoD)
AOB	Appellant's Opening Brief
AOB	All Other Business
AOB	Art of Business
AOB	Adjusted Occupied Bed
AOB	Anterior Open Bite (dentistry)
AOB	Alliance of Baptists
AOB	Art of Books (bookseller website)
AOB	Angle On the Bow
AOB	Average-On-Board
AOB	Andy O'Brien (Irish soccer player)
AOB	Approved Operating Budget
AOB	Away on Business (hospitality discount program)
AOB	aviation operations branch (US DoD)
AOB	Audio of Being (Matthew Good album)
AOB	Air Operations Branch
AOB	Airfield Operations Board
AOB	Alternate Operating Base
AOB	Airfield Operations Battalion (US Army Aviation)
AOB	Analytical Operations Branch
AOB	Auxiliary Order Board
AOB	Adiabatic Oxygen Bomb (calorimeter)
AOB	Angle Of Bearing
AOB	Alignment Outlet Box(es)
AOB	Asymptotic Optimal Boundary
AOB	Announcer on Board (advertising)

Jaime Wagner
j@bwagner.com.br

+55(51)8126-0916
skype: jaime_wagner

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: segunda-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2010 14:28
To: GNSO Council
Subject: Fwd: [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan

Just a thought, not on the topic itself but on the issue of adding agenda items after the cut-off date. I've discussed this privately with Olga and Chuck and we all wonder if there is anyone on the Council that is uncomfortable with including late agenda items such as this one? Although everytime we've done this I've personally felt it was fully justified, I wonder if everyone is OK with this?

Thanks,

Stéphane

Début du message réexpédié :

De : "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>

Date : 3 janvier 2010 18:43:05 HNEC

À : "GNSO Council" <council@gnso.icann.org>

Objet : [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan

I just received a message from Janis Karklins regarding the joint GAC/GNSO meeting in Nairobi confirming the 5-6 pm slot on Sunday. He also proposed the following two topics for discussion:

1. New gTLD policy implementation, including EoI

2. AoC

I know that we are already past our deadline for agenda finalization, but I believe that would should initiate discussion on this on 7 Jan.  There will be no action other than discussion regarding the following: 1) how we feel about the two proposed topics; 2) whether we have any other topics we want to suggest; 3) how should we proceed in preparing for the session with the GAC. 

Glen - Please add the following to the 7 Jan agenda under AOB:

7.3 Joint Meeting with the GAC in Nairobi

7.3.1 Discussion re. GAC proposed topics: 1) New gTLD policy implementation, including EoI; 2) AoC.

7.3.2 Other possible topics to propose to the GAC?

7.3.3 Discussion re. how we should prepare for the joint GAC/GNSO session.

Thanks, Chuck