Another amendment proposed to be
added to the list of Resolutions:
Resolved, the GNSO Council instructs ICANN Policy Staff to add the
remaining RAP Recommendations to the GNSO Project List so that the GNSO Council
can keep track of the remaining recommendations and address these as
appropriate.
This is language from one of the
initial drafts put together by staff and I think it helps allaying any concerns
that the rest of RAP recommendations are not being dealt with by the Council.
Sincerely,
Zahid
Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil
& Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221
Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether
Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell:
+923008238230
Tel:
+92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax:
+92 21 35655026
Notice
/ Disclaimer
This
message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged
information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction,
publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or
parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means
whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is
prohibited.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Zahid Jamil
Sent: 03 February 2011 09:55
To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; 'GNSO Council'
Subject: RE: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's
Amendment to RAP motion
Dear Jeff,
Happy to treat as friendly.
Also may I suggest that in order
to ensure that there is no confusion as a result of the Resolutions that the
Council may possibly be disregarding the OTHER RAP WG/RAP IDT recommendations,
an appropriate WHERAS be added that in gist says that the Council acknowledges
the extensive work of the RAP WG/RAP IDT and their recommendations and the
following Resolutions do not mean that the Council has disregarded the other
recommendations which will be addressed in due course by the Council.
We need to move on these issues
as Council and at the same time ensure fulfilling our role as Policy Managers
respecting the bottom up policy making process.
Sincerely,
Zahid
Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil
& Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221
Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether
Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell:
+923008238230
Tel:
+92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax:
+92 21 35655026
Notice
/ Disclaimer
This
message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged
information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction,
publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or
parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means
whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is
prohibited.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: 03 February 2011 07:14
To: Neuman, Jeff; 'GNSO Council'
Subject: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's
Amendment to RAP motion
All,
It is my
understanding that despite the original author of a motion wanting the
withdraw, the motion may indeed still be on the table if 2 Councilors support
the motion staying on the table. I cannot say whether that will happen,
but in the event it does (or if it comes up later), I have to correct the
Friendly Amendment proposed by the Registries. It should read:
·
Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant
agreements by registrars who adopt them, and
for use by TLD operators who adopt them.
So the full amendment would read:
RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on
the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries
address the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Final Report.
This effort should consider (but not be limited the
following subjects:
• Practices for identifying stolen credentials
• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms
of malicious use (such as malware and phishing)
• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant
agreements by registrars who adopt them, and
for use by TLD operators who adopt them.
• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain
registered by abusers
• Practices for suspending domain names
• Account access security management
• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and
registries
• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices
being used, and their adoption rates.
I hope this is still
treated as friendly.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The
information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of
the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:14 PM
To: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion
All,
The RySG is proposing a friendly amendment to Zahid’s proposed amendment to the
RAP Motion. We understand Zahid’s motion is not considered friendly by
Tim, so there will be a vote on Zahid’s proposal. As discussed on
an RySG call this morning, the RySG will support Zahid’s proposed amendment if
his motion is amended by adding the word “possible” in the sentence:
·
Creating anti-abuse terms of
service for possible inclusion in
Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.
So the full amendment would read:
RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on
the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries
address the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Final Report.
This effort should consider (but not be limited the
following subjects:
• Practices for identifying stolen credentials
• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms
of malicious use (such as malware and phishing)
• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible
inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.
• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain
registered by abusers
• Practices for suspending domain names
• Account access security management
• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and
registries
• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices
being used, and their adoption rates.
The rationale is that the premise of the work
is for the creation of non-binding best practices and adding this word is in
line with that notion. We hope this will be considered friendly.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J.
Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law &
Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772
Mobile: +1.202.549.5079
Fax: +1.703.738.7965
/ jeff.neuman@neustar.biz
/ www.neustar.biz
The
information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of
the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in
error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately and delete the original message.