Thanks Avri, I also last night had added in one other request for an update as to the pending SSAC study, which I think you may have inadvertently omitted from below? It should go as section (e) and then the process outline as section (f):

e) requests an update on the pending SSAC study on “Information Gathering Using Domain Name Registration Records” outlined in September, 2006. See http://www.icann.org/committees/security/information-gathering-28Sep2006.pdf

Now I have inserted it below and changed the numbering.

Mike Rodenbaugh

Sr. Legal Director

Yahoo! Inc.

NOTE: This message may be protected by attorney-client and/or work product privileges, if you are not the intended recipient then please delete this message and all attachments and notify me as soon as possible. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:14 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motions under AOB for council meeting September 6 2007

Hi,

On consideration I will accept your proposal as a friendly amendment

as stated below.

I have also accepted Chuck's friendly amendment on your friendly

amendment as well.

It is also my assumption that Ross' proposed amendment remains on the

table and will

be voted on before the motion as amended.

I must note that my original motion was never properly seconded.

Does anyone second this motion?

The proposed amendment, has however, been seconded.

I am assuming that now both the original Mike Rodenbough (BCUC)

motion and the

counter motion by Ross Rader are now off the table.

thanks

----------------------

Proposed motion to finish Whois work as amended by Mike Rodenbaugh

for vote on Sept 06, 2007

Whereas;

1. The Whois WG has now completed its work,

Therefore;

Be it resolved, that the GNSO Council;

The GNSO Council accepts the WG report and appreciates the efforts

made by WG

participants and ICANN staff in preparing this report. Further, the

GNSO council

also:

a) graciously thanks all of the volunteers, consultants, staff and

others who

have participated in the Task Force and Working Group.

b) makes no specific policy recommendation to the ICANN board at this

time

concerning Whois or related policy.

c) requests ICANN Staff to proceed with a study of the factual

characteristics

of the Whois database, as suggested by the GAC and by the Working

Group report.

This study should include a review and analysis of the different

proxy services

available today, a summary of any other statistical studies that

Staff can locate,

and ideally should be completed by October 4, 2007.

d) requests an update on the WHOIS Data Accuracy Program outlined by

ICANN Staff on

April 27th, including any statistical information that can be

summarized thus far.

See http://www.icann.org/whois/whois-data-accuracy-

program-27apr07.pdf.

f) shall review any additional factual information, in conjunction

with the

policy suggestions from the Task Force and Working Group reports,

complete this

work on Whois, and make a report to the ICANN community and to

the ICANN Board,

as follows:

1 - Staff will produce a Draft Final Report that references the TF

report, the WG

charter and the WG report by and which includes an overall

description of the

process by September 13. This overview should include the text

of motions to

be voted on at the end of this process.

2 - This report will be sent out for Constituency Statement Review on

September 13.

Constituencies will be asked to follow the by-laws on

constituency statements.

Specifically :

1. Constituency Statements.

The Representatives will each be responsible for soliciting

the position of their constituencies, at a minimum, and other

comments as each Representative deems appropriate, regarding

the issue under consideration. This position and other

comments,

as applicable, should be submitted in a formal statement to

the

task force chair (each, a "Constituency Statement") within

thirty-five

(35) calendar days after initiation of the PDP.

Every Constituency Statement shall include at least the

following:

(i) If a Supermajority Vote was reached, a clear statement

of the

constituency's position on the issue;

(ii) If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear

statement of all

positions espoused by constituency members;

(iii) A clear statement of how the constituency arrived at

its position(s).

Specifically, the statement should detail specific

constituency meetings,

teleconferences, or other means of deliberating an

issue, and a list of

all members who participated or otherwise submitted

their views;

(iv) An analysis of how the issue would affect the

constituency, including

any financial impact on the constituency; and

(v) An analysis of the period of time that would likely be

necessary to

implement the policy.

**Final Date for for updated constituency statement: October 4, 2007

3 - Staff will Incorporate Constituency comments and any additional

factual information

into Final Report by October 11, 2007

4 - Staff is requested to produce staff implementation notes by

October 15

5 - Community Public Comment on Final Report: October 15 - November

6, 2007

6 - A Public and Council Discussion will be held during the LA Public

Meeting

7 - Final vote on first GNSO Council meeting after November 6, 2007

On 6 sep 2007, at 02.09, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> The BC also had a motion pending, seconded by the IPC. We will

> rescind

> that motion in favor of this compromise motion that incorporates

> BC, IPC

> and GAC request for an additional factual study, and requests

> updates on

> ongoing ICANN studies, to incorporate that information into the

> process

> suggested by Avri's motion.

> Please see attached. I am not sure if Avri would consider this a

> friendly amendment to her motion. But otherwise we suggest it as an

> alternative.

> Kind regards,

> Mike Rodenbaugh

> Sr. Legal Director

> Yahoo! Inc.

> NOTE: This message may be protected by attorney-client and/or work

> product privileges, if you are not the intended recipient then please

> delete this message and all attachments and notify me as soon as

> possible. Thanks.

...

> Proposed Amendment From Ross Rader to the Whois end process motion:

> - that "November 6, 2007" in step 5 be replaced with "October 31,

> 2007"

> - that "after November 6, 2007" in step 7 be replaced with "during

> the LA Public Meeting".

> <BC Compromise Resolution - 2.doc>