On Mar 16, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com> wrote:

hi all,

these look great.  i marked them up with the questions that popped out at me as i read them.  i was doing this mostly as notes to myself and intended to just bring these up on Saturday.  but i’ve attached them to this reply in case time grows tight in Singapore.  these are my reactions as an individual and have not been reviewed by the ISPCP.

great start!  

mikey


<PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014 - Mikey.doc>
<PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore - Mikey.doc>


On Mar 14, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:

Dear All,

On behalf of the Policy & Implementation Working Group I would like to share with you the working definitions and working principles (under final review) that the WG has developed to facilitate its deliberations on the charter questions. You are encouraged to share these with your respective groups and share any feedback you may have with the WG either during its update to the GNSO in Singapore or as part of its F2F meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 26 March from 15.30 – 17.00 SGT in room Sophia, please see http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-policy-implementation

Best regards,

Marika
<PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore.doc><PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014.doc>


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)