Yes, friendly.
Debra Y. Hughes l Senior
Counsel
American Red Cross
Office of the General
Counsel
2025 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Phone: (202) 303-5356
Fax: (202) 303-0143
HughesDeb@usa.redcross.org
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of john@crediblecontext.com
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:41
PM
To: stephane.vangelder@indom.com
Cc: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Whois
Studies
Yes, friendly
Berard
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Whois Studies
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder
> To: "council@gnso.icann.org GNSO"
> John, Debbie, do you consider these friendly?
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 20 avr. 2011 à 21:09, Jonathan Robinson a écrit :
> All,
>
> Based on the rationalisation outlined below, I would like to propose that
Council further defers consideration of the WHOIS Registrant
Identification Study i.e. that the motion be amended as follows:
>
> �Council defers consideration of the WHOIS Registrant Identification Study
until the 9 June 2011 meeting and requests that any applicable
motions in that regard be submitted not later than 1 June 2011.�
>
> The rationale for further delay is that the small working group of
volunteers has met twice recently to discuss the Whois Study #2, the WHOIS
Registrant Identification Study. The intention was to have a revised
Study 2 proposal for Council consideration in the 28 April meeting. They
anticipated making revisions to reduce presumptively negative terminology while
retaining the original study design to prove/disprove a hypothesis that natural
persons were using privacy/proxy while also engaging in commercial
activities. But the discussion revealed more extensive questions about
study 2:
> · First, they believe
that the present Study 2 proposal could be easily amended to answer all four
registrant identification questions posed by the GAC in their April-2008
recommendations.
> · Second, they
believe that the objective and results of Study 2 can be improved to generate
broader and deeper analysis that would provide needed context for GNSO and
ICANN in future work on these issues.
> Their goal will be to submit Study 2 recommendations to the Council not
later than 1 June, in time for the 9 June Council meeting.
> This delay should not have any impact on Studies 3 & 4, which are
under consideration in the motion that is to be acted on April 28.
> Best wishes,
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>