Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
Yes Rosemary, I would consider this to be a friendly amendment,
noting that I think you meant the ‘2nd Whereas’ clause instead of
the ‘2nd Resolve’ clause.
Olga, do you also accept this as friendly?
Chuck
From: Rosemary Sinclair
[mailto:Rosemary.Sinclair@atug.org.au]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:27 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Cc: ncsg-policy@n4c.eu; ncsg-ec@n4c.eu
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG
Hi
Chuck
NCSG
have been looking at the motion re Rec6 CWG
Would
you regard the following as a friendly amendment?
….
change the wording of the 2nd RESOLVED clause, which currently reads:
"WHEREAS,
numerous stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed implementation
of the GNSO Council’s Recommendation 6 regarding procedures for addressing
culturally objectionable and/or sensitive strings;"
to
(proposed changes in bold) -
"WHEREAS, various
stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed implementation of the
GNSO Council’s Recommendation 6 regarding strings that contravene
generally-accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that are
recognized under international principles of law;"
To
many of our members as well as NCSG colleagues on this working group, the new
wording is a more accurate description of what Rec 6 states, as opposed to a
broader concept of cultural "sensitivities" or
"objectionable" strings.
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair
Managing Director, ATUG
Chairman, INTUG
T: +61 2 94958901 F: +61 2 94193889
M: +61 413734490
Email: rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au
Skype: rasinclair
Please visit the ATUG website for Updates and Information
www.atug.com.au
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf
Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, 1 September 2010 3:01 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG
It was suggested to me that
it would be a good idea to document our support for the community working group
that the GAC requested to discuss new gTLD recommendation 6 on morality and
public order. In follow-up to that suggestion, I am making the following
motion.
Chuck
Motion To Support A
Cross Community Working Group On New gTLD Recommendation 6
WHEREAS, ICANN
aims to ensure that the New gTLD Program contains appropriate safeguards to
address culturally objectionable and/or sensitive strings, while protecting
internationally recognized freedom of expression rights;
WHEREAS,
numerous stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed implementation
of the GNSO Council’s Recommendation 6 regarding procedures for addressing culturally objectionable
and/or sensitive strings;
WHEREAS, the
GNSO Council desires to participate in a joint working group with other
interested Supporting Organizations (SO’s) and Advisory Committee (AC’s) to provide guidance to the ICANN new
gTLD Implementation Team and the ICANN Board with regard to the implementation
of recommendation 6;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT:
RESOLVED, that
the GNSO Council supports the formation of a cross-community working group to
provide guidance to the ICANN
new gTLD Implementation Team and the ICANN Board with regard to the
implementation of recommendation 6;
RESOLVED
FURTHER, that Stéphane Van Gelder shall serve as the GNSO Council Liaison for
this cross-community working group until 13 September 2010;
RESOLVED
FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the Terms of Reference to guide the activities
of this cross-community working group;
RESOLVED FURTHER,
that ICANN Staff shall identify and assign applicable Staff support for this
working group and arrange for support tools such as a mailing list, website and
other tools as needed.