+1. I never took the language to exclude NCAs, so if we feel the need to say this explicitly, then we should.
J.
I’m not sure why there is uncertainty.
This motion is related to the GNSO future. NCAs – as members of the council – are part of the GNSO. They should undoubtedly given the opportunity to take part in this effort – either being appointed themselves or appoint others.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment
Heather,
> As I see it, only the houseless NCA falls into this category
Not sure - a house is, as I see it, neither a constituency or a stakeholder group,
as the whole concept of "houses" is, at least the way I see it, basically just a
voting construct. But, again, I could be very wrong. And anyway, my spell
checker keeps insisting "houseless" should be spelled "horseless".
> but I assume any SG or C could nominate someone of their choosing
> (not necessarily someone from within the SG/C).
I guess so, yes - but (and now we are really getting into minor details, but...)
can a NCA nominate anyone?
Julf