Hello Greg 

This suggested Board topic is very important: 
2. How can we work more closely together to ensure governments are encouraged not to legislate around the multi-stakeholder model? 

Are we dropping it? I recommend not to. 

Farzaneh 


On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:15 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Councilors,

 

The Board has proposed the following possible topics for our ICANN 82 bilateral and encouraged us to suggest others.

 

Board topics:
1. Please provide input on meeting structure

2. How can we work more closely together to ensure governments are encouraged not to legislate around the multi-stakeholder model? 

3. What are the challenges you face in contributing to the budget and ops plan discussions?

 

Of these, Leadership believes topic one is likely the most relevant. We propose the following agenda for this bilateral:

 

1. Please provide input on meeting structure (Board topic)

2. Addressing process gap (unadapting recommendations) (GNSO topic)

3. Board-readiness/continuous improvement (GNSO topic)

 

Please provide any feedback by 22 February. We will have a chance to discuss more specific talking points on each topic during a working session before the meeting with the Board.

 

Thanks,

Greg

_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.