Good questions Mary.  I don't think we have any guidelines in that regard, but because this is simply a charter drafting team and not the PDP WG itself, I would hope that we can keep it relatively small for efficiency sake. I would think that one per SG/Constituency plus an NCA and an ALAC person should suffice, but that is strictly my personal thinking.
 
Chuck

From: Mary Wong [mailto:MWong@piercelaw.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 2:17 PM
To: GNSO Council List; Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [council] Volunteers for Charter Drafting Team for Vertical Integration PDP

Chuck and everyone, are there any limits/guidelines as to how many from each SG/Constituency/AC?
 
I'm assuming that given the time line, subject matter and other workload, we should not be proceeding with a huge number of people.
 
(sorry if I should know this out of the WG procedures or something, but figured if there was indeed a figure, this was the expert list to ask!)

Thanks,
Mary
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@piercelaw.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>>
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>
To: "GNSO Council List" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Date: 1/31/2010 10:09 AM
Subject: [council] Volunteers for Charter Drafting Team for Vertical Integration PDP
In follow-up to Council approval to initiate a Vertical Integration PDP and specifically the action item to form a drafting team to develop a charter for that PDP, I am hereby requesting volunteers for the DT.  Volunteers need not be Councilors.
 
If you or someone in your SG/Constituency/AC want to volunteer for this WT, please respond on this list not later than 9 February.
 
Chuck