Dear Jonathan.
It looks good to me and I support
the approach.
Best,
Lanre
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:11 PM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Councillors,
Thanks to those who
have responded.
Any other notes
support (or not) for this approach will be appreciated.
Jonathan
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: 06 November 2012 10:51
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Importance: High
Brian & Margie,
Thank-you both for
the efforts to bring this to the point you have now got it to.
Fellow
Councillors, please note the following:
1. We now have a summary of our respective
positions as well as an appropriate covering letter
2. The board is scheduled to meet to discuss this
issue in approximately 48 hours (8th November)
Therefore, I believe
that we should send this letter to the board including an apology for the fact
that it arrives immediately before their meeting.
My view is that
sending our response late (as we will have to do) is better than not sending it
all for two reasons:
A. We have done a lot of work on this
B. It does not reflect well on us as a Council to
not send a response.
Please can I have
your support (or opposition if you feel that) for sending this letter
tomorrow.
In order to do so, I
need your support (or not) by no later than 05h00 UTC on Wed 7th
November.
Jonathan
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org]
On Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian
Sent: 05 November 2012 23:29
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Cc: Margie.Milam@icann.org
Subject: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Dear
all:
I
would like to thank Margie for her hard work collecting data and assembling the
attached chart on the recommendations from the WHOIS Review Team Final
Report. We owe an apology to the Board for taking longer on this endeavor
than was originally anticipated.
Attached
for the consideration and approval of the entire Council please our draft
letter to the Board. It is composed of a brief introductory letter, or
executive summary, and a chart outlining each constituency and stakeholder
position on whether there is agreement with each specific WHOIS Review Team Final
Report recommendation and whether a Policy Development Process is
required. We have attached a .DOC version of the letter and chart to
facilitate any final additions or amendments.
We
look forward to expeditious consideration and approval by the Council, as well
as delivery to the Board of Directors.
Thank
you,
Brian
Brian
J. Winterfeldt
Steptoe
-------------------------------------------
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org on
behalf of Margie Milam[SMTP:MARGIE.MILAM@ICANN.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday,
October 30, 2012 10:51:27 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council]
Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Dear All,
Please find attached final
summary chart, clean and redlined, to reflect all of the input received to
date. Please note that the chart is missing any input from Registrars or
the NCSG regarding whether they agree/disagree with each of the WHOIS RT
recommendations.
All the best,
Margie
_________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_________
From: Margie Milam
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:58 PM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations- REMINDER FOR
FINAL COMMENTS
Dear All,
I just wanted to send a reminder
on this, since I have only received comments from the IPC.
Please let me know by COB today
whether your SG/C has any additional comments to the chart.
All the best,
Margie
From: Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:05 PM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations
Dear All,
As discussed last week, I updated the draft WHOIS RT
summary chart to include the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency,
and to include a column clarifying whether there was agreement with the substance
of each recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in the Public
Comment Forum (PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final Report.
In reviewing the comments
filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from each constituency/SG,
making it difficult to complete the chart. Notably missing were
comments from Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report (although in
some cases there were submissions on the draft report). In
addition, from the comments actually submitted, it was not clear whether
the commentators agreed/disagreed with the recommendation itself, since many of
the comments appeared to address aspects of the recommendations, as opposed to
evaluating the recommendation holistically.
As a result, it is important that each
constituency/stakeholder group review the information contained in the attached
chart, and indicate whether they agree/disagree with each of the
recommendations.
Please provide this information by
COB Monday, October 29, 2012, so that the chart can be finalized in
advance of the Board’s consideration of the WHOIS RT Final Report
Recommendations.
All the best,
Margie
_______
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______