Hi Sebastien
Thanks for this, and thanks to those who worked on the draft. I have proposed one addition to section 4 : “For avoidance of doubt, we do not believe that this should be effected by removing any seats from other
GNSO groups.” I would trust that my Council colleagues would not disagree with this.
thanks
Susan Payne
Head of Legal Policy
Com Laude
T +44 (0) 20 7421
8250
Ext 255
We are pleased to launch our
new YouTube channel
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>
On Behalf Of Sebastien--- via council
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 9:28 PM
To: COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs@icann.org>; gnso-secs@icann.org
Subject: [council] NomCom Rebalancing response
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QF_o1d5o3cqdJi1c_2YyWcsCepWpKGx-/edit?pli=1
Dear Council Colleagues,
We have prepared a response to the Board’s questions about the NomCom rebalancing.
While we discussed this in DC (albeit briefly), we didn’t sense the need for any specific response from the Council other than to maybe say that we would welcome the opportunity of a seat at the table for an NPOC representative (the only SG/C not currently
represented).
As it the tradition, the GNSO Council will limit its comments to what is directly a Council concern, and will let its different SG&Cs comment in their own right.
With this in mind, can I ask you to review the Google doc referenced above, and indicate by Friday 30 June any concerns you may have with this letter going out? The response deadline to the Board in Friday. Please also
ensure your SG/Cs formulate their own response by then if not already done.
Kindly,
Sebastien Ducos
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
+33612284445
France & Australia