I agree with Tom – great suggestion -  and of this is part of that debate, Michele: what do we all actually want/need here?

Best

Marie

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:56 AM
To: Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>; Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>; council@gnso.icann.org
Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69

 

Tom et al

 

Maybe it’d be more fruitful to be more specific about this?

 

Do we have any specific questions for them?

 

What value are we hoping to get out of the exchange?

 

Regards

 

Michele

 

 

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/

https://blacknight.blog/

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Personal blog: https://michele.blog/

Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

 

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>
Date: Monday 5 October 2020 at 04:09
To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69

 

Thank you Nathalie.

 

Just one comment.

 

The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO.

 

Cheers

 

Tom

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am
To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>
Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69

 

Dear all,

 

Keith circulated earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69.

 

Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed:

 

Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC

  1. DNS Abuse
  2. Next steps for EPDP
  3. Private use TLD
  4. SubPro
  5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice

Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020.

  1. EPDP Phase 2
    1. Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations         
    2. Handling of priority 2 recommendations
  1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps
  2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update
  3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting).

 

Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC

  1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2)
  2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination
  3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly.

 

Thank you!

 

Kind regards,

 

Nathalie