<<Survey for Board meeting with GNSO in Brussels.docx>>
Assuming I didn’t miss anyone’s preferences, here is a summary of support for discussion topics in our joint meetings in Brussels:
GAC/GNSO meeting
1. DAG 4, including morality and public order
o Support: Bill, Jaime, Wolf, Mary
o Oppose:
2. AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews
o Support: Bill, Jaime, Wolf, Mary
o Oppose:
3. RAA
o Support: Chuck, Mary?
o Oppose:
4. IDN ccPDP
o Support:
o Oppose: Chuck,
If there are no objections by Monday, I plan to suggest to Janis that we discuss topics 1 & 2 with the GAC. And would like to request a volunteer (or volunteers) to draft a brief (less than 5 minutes) intro to each topic including any questions we might have for the GAC.
Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting
1. There are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think this meeting has outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be useful to discuss the value or lack of value from both the GNSO and Board/Staff perspective.
o Support: Chuck, Stéphane
o Oppose:
2. What do Board members understand about the AoC commitment to promote competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice in the DNS marketplace, with a particular focus on GNSO work
o Support: Rosemary, Wolf
o Oppose:
3. ICANN and Internet governance directions
o Support: Terry, Bill, Jaime, Rafik, Mary
o Oppose: Wolf
4. DAG 4, including morality and public order
o Support: Wolf, Mary
Note that I sent the attached survey to Bruce Tonkin for the purpose of getting individual Board responses and asking Bruce what the best way of doing that would be.
ccNSO/GNSO meeting
1. DNS-CERT
o Support: Chuck, Bill, Mary
o Oppose:
2. Synchronized TLDs
o Support: Andrei
o Oppose:
If there are no objections by Monday, I will send these topics to Chris. Andrei has volunteered to prepare a brief intro to the Synchronized TLDs topic. We need a volunteer for the DNS-CERT to do the same.