Hi,

I still request that unanimous in the text be replaced with something like 'most' or even 'a super majority' (not sure we can use the consensus words without a GNSO process). I will still not vote for it, and will write up a comment explaining why, but at least the letter would be correctly describing the situation in the council.

I do not know how the vote will go, but I am pretty sure it will not be unanimous.

Thanks

avri

On 16-Dec-14 16:30, Tony Holmes wrote:

All

Just a polite reminder we agreed that input on the draft response from Council to the GNSO review could be received until 31^st December and Council would then vote electronically early January.

To date no proposed revisions have been received.

Best wishes for the festive season to all.

Tony