Dear all,

A friendly reminder to please provide input on the below discussion topics. Pending no objection, the suggested topics for the joint ICANN Board/ GNSO Council session will be sent on Monday 5^th October 2020.

Kind regards,

Nathalie

From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 23:21
To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>
Subject: INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69

Dear all,

Keith circulated earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69.

Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed:

Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC

• DNS Abuse
• Next steps for EPDP
• Private use TLD
• SubPro
• Meta discussions on SSAC Advice

Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5^th October 2020.

• EPDP Phase 2
  • Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations
  • Handling of priority 2 recommendations
• EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps
• EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update
• Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting).

Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC

• IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2)
• FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination
• ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly.

Thank you!

Kind regards,

Nathalie