GNSO Review: draft terms of reference
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] Following the ICANN Luxembourg Resolution, the GNSO Council has, with the support of the ICANN staff, developed the GNSO Review Terms of Reference. The draft Terms of Reference will be put before the ICANN Board at the Vancouver Annual General Meeting. The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies, individual members of the Board and other members of the ICANN community. The draft terms of reference http://www.icann.org/gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm are posted at: http://www.icann.org/ http://www.gnso.icann.org/ http://gnso.icann.org/comments-request/ Public comments are invited for a 21-day public comment period starting 27 October 2005 and ending 17 November 2005. Please submit your comments on the draft Terms of Reference to the mailing list at: <gnso-review-tor@icann.org>. The archive of comments is available at: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-tor/> Thank you in advance for your time spent considering this issue and commenting. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies,
For my sake, can someone clarify with me the consultation that was undertaken with the constituencies? If this is in reference to the consultation w/ the GNSO Council, this should be clarified. The difference is slight, but important (the document is much clearer, and I think I know the answer already, but I'm hesitant to jump to a conclusion). It would also be useful if the document also included a chronicle of the consultation undertaken in the development of the document. This announcement and the document aren't in sync on this point and it is useful to understand, definitively, whose input was made available during the preparation of a document. This is a useful feature of parts of the PDP that we would be well served to use elsewhere. Finally, can someone point me to "the GNSO Review – Background Information document" reference in the first paragraph? It might be helpful for others if this was made a hyperlink. Much thanks in advance, -ross GNSO SECRETARIAT wrote:
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
Following the ICANN Luxembourg Resolution, the GNSO Council has, with the support of the ICANN staff, developed the GNSO Review Terms of Reference. The draft Terms of Reference will be put before the ICANN Board at the Vancouver Annual General Meeting. The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies, individual members of the Board and other members of the ICANN community.
The draft terms of reference http://www.icann.org/gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm
are posted at: http://www.icann.org/ http://www.gnso.icann.org/ http://gnso.icann.org/comments-request/
Public comments are invited for a 21-day public comment period starting 27 October 2005 and ending 17 November 2005.
Please submit your comments on the draft Terms of Reference to the mailing list at: <gnso-review-tor@icann.org>. The archive of comments is available at: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-tor/>
Thank you in advance for your time spent considering this issue and commenting.
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
As has been pointed out on the GA-List, it would also be useful to clarify when the comment period actually begins and ends given that this item was posted on the 31st, not the 27th as the text of the announcement would indicate. Ross Rader wrote:
The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies,
For my sake, can someone clarify with me the consultation that was undertaken with the constituencies? If this is in reference to the consultation w/ the GNSO Council, this should be clarified. The difference is slight, but important (the document is much clearer, and I think I know the answer already, but I'm hesitant to jump to a conclusion).
It would also be useful if the document also included a chronicle of the consultation undertaken in the development of the document. This announcement and the document aren't in sync on this point and it is useful to understand, definitively, whose input was made available during the preparation of a document. This is a useful feature of parts of the PDP that we would be well served to use elsewhere.
Finally, can someone point me to "the GNSO Review – Background Information document" reference in the first paragraph? It might be helpful for others if this was made a hyperlink.
Much thanks in advance,
-ross
GNSO SECRETARIAT wrote:
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
Following the ICANN Luxembourg Resolution, the GNSO Council has, with the support of the ICANN staff, developed the GNSO Review Terms of Reference. The draft Terms of Reference will be put before the ICANN Board at the Vancouver Annual General Meeting. The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies, individual members of the Board and other members of the ICANN community.
The draft terms of reference http://www.icann.org/gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm
are posted at: http://www.icann.org/ http://www.gnso.icann.org/ http://gnso.icann.org/comments-request/
Public comments are invited for a 21-day public comment period starting 27 October 2005 and ending 17 November 2005.
Please submit your comments on the draft Terms of Reference to the mailing list at: <gnso-review-tor@icann.org>. The archive of comments is available at: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-tor/>
Thank you in advance for your time spent considering this issue and commenting.
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
The public comment period on the GNSO Review Terms of Reference http://www.icann.org/gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm began on 27 October and runs till 17 November 2005. The notice informing the Council, constituencies, the GA, and the Announce list subscribers that the GNSO Review Terms of Reference were published for public comment was posted on 31 October 2005. Apologies for the confusion! Glen Ross Rader wrote:
As has been pointed out on the GA-List, it would also be useful to clarify when the comment period actually begins and ends given that this item was posted on the 31st, not the 27th as the text of the announcement would indicate.
Ross Rader wrote:
The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies,
For my sake, can someone clarify with me the consultation that was undertaken with the constituencies? If this is in reference to the consultation w/ the GNSO Council, this should be clarified. The difference is slight, but important (the document is much clearer, and I think I know the answer already, but I'm hesitant to jump to a conclusion).
It would also be useful if the document also included a chronicle of the consultation undertaken in the development of the document. This announcement and the document aren't in sync on this point and it is useful to understand, definitively, whose input was made available during the preparation of a document. This is a useful feature of parts of the PDP that we would be well served to use elsewhere.
Finally, can someone point me to "the GNSO Review – Background Information document" reference in the first paragraph? It might be helpful for others if this was made a hyperlink.
Much thanks in advance,
-ross
GNSO SECRETARIAT wrote:
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
Following the ICANN Luxembourg Resolution, the GNSO Council has, with the support of the ICANN staff, developed the GNSO Review Terms of Reference. The draft Terms of Reference will be put before the ICANN Board at the Vancouver Annual General Meeting. The draft Terms of Reference were developed through consultation with GNSO constituencies, individual members of the Board and other members of the ICANN community.
The draft terms of reference http://www.icann.org/gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm
are posted at: http://www.icann.org/ http://www.gnso.icann.org/ http://gnso.icann.org/comments-request/
Public comments are invited for a 21-day public comment period starting 27 October 2005 and ending 17 November 2005.
Please submit your comments on the draft Terms of Reference to the mailing list at: <gnso-review-tor@icann.org>. The archive of comments is available at: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-review-tor/>
Thank you in advance for your time spent considering this issue and commenting.
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
-- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
Dear Council Members: Please be advised that the ICANN Board is scheduled to have a teleconference on 8-Nov-2005. The agenda is listed below and also been posted online in accordance with the bylaws at http://www.icann.org/minutes/. * Consideration of .ASIA sTLD Application * Review and Consideration of Policy Development Process Results and Public Comments for "Procedure for use by ICANN in considering requests for consent and related contractual amendments to allow changes in the architecture or operation of a gTLD registry" * Board Governance Committee's Recommendation for the Creation of a new Board Compensation Committee * Briefing Regarding Certain Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Budget Items * Authorization to Bind Professional Liability Insurance Proposal * Redelegation of .GS (South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands) * Approval of Legal Expenses * Single Letter 2d Level Domain Name Discussion * Authorization to Enter into Addendum to Marina del Rey Sublease * Proposed ICANN Bylaws Changes on Interim ALAC's Certification of At-Large Structures * Proposed Guidelines for Implementation of IDN's, v.2.0 * Approval of Board of Director's Expenses * Other Business Should anyone have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Michael D. Palage
participants (4)
-
GNSO SECRETARIAT -
GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG
-
Michael D. Palage -
Ross Rader