Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan - I am happy to volunteer to be part of this group Kind regards Joy On 14/03/2013 7:13 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together.
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:
1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?
3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.
Thank-you,
Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRQd5hAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqPkoH/A3EyZyiZ8MohHv6wUlEGtae Bvq1QN81S1b45Ky3Tn2WWaLU7XZpNZ0vIrOVRygMKhOwNJh+mLrMXmbiLBDWkPhP VpBDS6BXLww4/zT46N8LACUzndUdfK70SKx0WCJnWhF4vf1OThFohZOnki6JuIgW OVNP0wSaMMcIHaQmapn7VOOfojQIwDwD2IJmUQ/LQDH3BCLerqW8Go3KIbr7F930 JxqmXt510qLkUOYk6X3mB0qEd0QhC9nMF24MJM1sIE/nk4tUhLihOKt5o24e01Zm Nnjjvlk9nRjMR8GJLhjvd/DdVxrP39Lm95CuvqUc2e6XmJqyLLEsjJ0P+97XeoI= =BsDJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi Jonathan -- I'd like to volunteer for this group. Thanks! Ching
On 14/03/2013 7:13 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together.
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:
1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?
3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.
Thank-you,
Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRQd5hAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqPkoH/A3EyZyiZ8MohHv6wUlEGtae Bvq1QN81S1b45Ky3Tn2WWaLU7XZpNZ0vIrOVRygMKhOwNJh+mLrMXmbiLBDWkPhP VpBDS6BXLww4/zT46N8LACUzndUdfK70SKx0WCJnWhF4vf1OThFohZOnki6JuIgW OVNP0wSaMMcIHaQmapn7VOOfojQIwDwD2IJmUQ/LQDH3BCLerqW8Go3KIbr7F930 JxqmXt510qLkUOYk6X3mB0qEd0QhC9nMF24MJM1sIE/nk4tUhLihOKt5o24e01Zm Nnjjvlk9nRjMR8GJLhjvd/DdVxrP39Lm95CuvqUc2e6XmJqyLLEsjJ0P+97XeoI= =BsDJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks Ching, Joy & Petter. Idea from ccNSO was to have a 2 from each sides type structure, to include or exclude liasons (i.e. up to 3) to keep it smallish. From: ching.chiao@gmail.com [mailto:ching.chiao@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ching Chiao [Registry.Asia] Sent: 14 March 2013 14:32 To: Jonathan Robinson; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing Hi Jonathan -- I'd like to volunteer for this group. Thanks! Ching On 14/03/2013 7:13 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together.
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:
1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?
3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.
Thank-you,
Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRQd5hAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqPkoH/A3EyZyiZ8MohHv6wUlEGtae Bvq1QN81S1b45Ky3Tn2WWaLU7XZpNZ0vIrOVRygMKhOwNJh+mLrMXmbiLBDWkPhP VpBDS6BXLww4/zT46N8LACUzndUdfK70SKx0WCJnWhF4vf1OThFohZOnki6JuIgW OVNP0wSaMMcIHaQmapn7VOOfojQIwDwD2IJmUQ/LQDH3BCLerqW8Go3KIbr7F930 JxqmXt510qLkUOYk6X3mB0qEd0QhC9nMF24MJM1sIE/nk4tUhLihOKt5o24e01Zm Nnjjvlk9nRjMR8GJLhjvd/DdVxrP39Lm95CuvqUc2e6XmJqyLLEsjJ0P+97XeoI= =BsDJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
All, In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org> Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia> Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com> Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com However, ideally we'd like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard. It looks like the ccNSO will have 2. So . two questions: 1. John Berard - Are you available as part of this group? 2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating? Thank-you. Jonathan From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
Hi Jonathan, Since I'll now be participating remotely, I am less worried about attending this meeting. So please feel free to count me out of consideration for this one. Many thanks, Maria On 18 March 2013 16:57, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com>wrote:
All,****
** **
In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows:****
** **
Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> ****
Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org> ****
Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia> ****
Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com> ****
Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com****
** **
However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard.****
It looks like the ccNSO will have 2.****
** **
So … two questions:****
** **
**1. **John Berard – Are you available as part of this group?****
**2. **From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating?****
** **
Thank-you.****
** **
** **
Jonathan****
** **
*From:* owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* 13 March 2013 18:14 *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing****
** **
All,****
** **
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.****
** **
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. ****
** **
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:****
** **
**1. **Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.****
**2. **The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?****
**3. **Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.****
** **
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. ****
** **
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.****
** **
Thank-you,****
** **
** **
Jonathan****
** **
Thanks Maria. As you know, I am sorry you cannot be with us in Beijing. Jonathan. From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@gmail.com] Sent: 18 March 2013 17:13 To: Jonathan Robinson Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing Hi Jonathan, Since I'll now be participating remotely, I am less worried about attending this meeting. So please feel free to count me out of consideration for this one. Many thanks, Maria On 18 March 2013 16:57, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote: All, In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org> Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia> Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com> Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com However, ideally we'd like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard. It looks like the ccNSO will have 2. So . two questions: 1. John Berard - Are you available as part of this group? 2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating? Thank-you. Jonathan From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
Jonathan, I am happy to participate in the planning. What are the day/time particulars or will it be done asynchronously by email? Cheers, Berard --------- Original Message ---------Subject: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> Date: 3/18/13 9:57 am To: council@gnso.icann.org All, In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org> Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia> Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com> Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard. It looks like the ccNSO will have 2. So … two questions: 1. John Berard – Are you available as part of this group? 2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating? Thank-you. Jonathan From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
Thanks John, I expect email in the first instance with possible telecom in addition. Jonathan From: john@crediblecontext.com [mailto:john@crediblecontext.com] Sent: 18 March 2013 17:32 To: Jonathan Robinson; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing Jonathan, I am happy to participate in the planning. What are the day/time particulars or will it be done asynchronously by email? Cheers, Berard --------- Original Message --------- Subject: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> Date: 3/18/13 9:57 am To: council@gnso.icann.org All, In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org> Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia> Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com> Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard. It looks like the ccNSO will have 2. So … two questions: 1. John Berard – Are you available as part of this group? 2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating? Thank-you. Jonathan From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
All, Sorry to hear that Maria cannot participate. I will be there and is still "passionate about participating" ;-) Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> <http://www.fenixlegal.eu/> NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <http://www.fenixlegal.eu/> Thank you On 18 mar 2013 17:57 "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
All, In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows: Petter Rindforth <<petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu>> Joy Liddicoat <<joy@apc.org>> Ching Chiao <<chiao@registry.asia>> Maria Farrell <<maria.farrell@gmail.com>> Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com> However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard. It looks like the ccNSO will have 2. So … two questions: 1. John Berard – Are you available as part of this group? 2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating? Thank-you. Jonathan From:owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf OfJonathan Robinson Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing All, We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance. Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together. We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows: 1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches. 2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this? 3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving. We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people. I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so. Thank-you, Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all - Not sure if you got my note yesterday Jonathan with ideas for this session? I'd like to participate if possible, but not if the competition for space is unseemly :-) Best Joy On 19/03/2013 5:57 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as follows:
Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu <mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu>>
Joy Liddicoat <joy@apc.org <mailto:joy@apc.org>>
Ching Chiao <chiao@registry.asia <mailto:chiao@registry.asia>>
Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com <mailto:maria.farrell@gmail.com>>
Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com <mailto:wendy@seltzer.com>
However, ideally we?d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO liaison, John Berard.
It looks like the ccNSO will have 2.
So ? two questions:
1. John Berard ? Are you available as part of this group?
2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not participating?
Thank-you.
Jonathan
*From:*owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* 13 March 2013 18:14 *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
All,
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together.
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:
1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?
3. Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.
Thank-you,
Jonathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRR4jWAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqVnAH/RhLKkuaxkpGfGxQNpM0qC6+ xXpy5tM6V5bCuvh3mFj7aVm6CA8CcSUEC7J579CzEyNcQF4Gkn7Rr3npA752WLT2 R6rHH0j/MpIN7fn33jhrB0df9tM67evylmcU/7cmHSRopZ2hSDc9K5s+rqhj6mgr MYiaJ2GIrsh5m0d6mL7EZXevZzLNUJjfX+btlcDjsFRvT243SefTXVnHPZUNQcgs ncOrHBUUDicAabDNcHNG9gFeqNrjiUbad9J2M+Z8Dh84URO3NcdetanZX+vnDaJP iZZgFVwEGCVBlkliohKjEUPYfwHk2Poymma7lWAC09+iOp6Lc5b4eXwMYBZEGWw= =43w2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (6)
-
Ching Chiao [Registry.Asia] -
john＠crediblecontext.com -
Jonathan Robinson -
joy -
Maria Farrell -
Petter Rindforth