Motion on the Proposed Approach for Implementing Recommendations from the GNSO Review
Dear council colleagues, after the GNSO preparatory discussion on the GNSO review over the last weekend in Marrakech I intend to withdraw the respective motion at the council meeting on Wednesday. This is attached to the expectation that you’ll immediately start the discussion about the approach suggested by the Review Working Party within your community. On the basis of the input given by the SGs/Cs the council should then develop a common position on the proposal that the motion can be resubmitted, preferably to the next council meeting on 14 April. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Mary Wong Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:04 PM To: WUKnoben ; Marika Konings Subject: Re: Motion on GNSO review Wolf-Ulrich, that sounds perfect – assuming you intend to withdraw AT the meeting rather than BEFORE. Thanks and cheers Mary From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 18:51 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Subject: Motion on GNSO review Ladies, is there anything to be put forward formally at the council meeting rather than just saying: “I withdraw”? Adding that the discussion on SG/C-level should start immediately and it is expected that a common position can be achieved to submit a motion to the next council meeting Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Thank you, Wolf-Ulrich. We will note this motion withdrawal on our Wednesday agenda, as well as your timeline and path forward. Thank you, J. ____________ James Bladel On Mar 8, 2016, at 23:08, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>> wrote: Dear council colleagues, after the GNSO preparatory discussion on the GNSO review over the last weekend in Marrakech I intend to withdraw the respective motion at the council meeting on Wednesday. This is attached to the expectation that you'll immediately start the discussion about the approach suggested by the Review Working Party within your community. On the basis of the input given by the SGs/Cs the council should then develop a common position on the proposal that the motion can be resubmitted, preferably to the next council meeting on 14 April. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Mary Wong<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:04 PM To: WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> ; Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Subject: Re: Motion on GNSO review Wolf-Ulrich, that sounds perfect - assuming you intend to withdraw AT the meeting rather than BEFORE. Thanks and cheers Mary From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 18:51 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Subject: Motion on GNSO review Ladies, is there anything to be put forward formally at the council meeting rather than just saying: "I withdraw"? Adding that the discussion on SG/C-level should start immediately and it is expected that a common position can be achieved to submit a motion to the next council meeting Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
participants (2)
-
James M. Bladel -
WUKnoben