Hi, Seems a reasonable change to me. Since I am making the motion on behalf of the DT, my suggestion is that I run the change by them. a. On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:05 -0700, Tim Ruiz wrote:

Avri and Allan,

The intended friendly amendment to PEDNR I am asking for is to replace the first paragraph of the RESOLVE section to the following:

"to initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP) to address the issues identified in the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Issues Report. The charter for this PDP should instruct the Working Group: (i) that it should consider recommendations for best practices as well as or instead of recommendations for Consensus Policy; (ii) that to inform its work it should pursue the availability of further information from ICANN compliance staff to understand how current RAA provisions and consensus policies regarding deletion, auto-renewal, and recovery of domain names during the RGP are enforced; and (iii) that it should specifically consider the following questions:"

Reason: We just approved a set of amendments to the RAA and we have a group forming to discuss further changes to the RAA. For the RrC, it seems onerous to include the potential for RAA changs in every PDP that gets initiated and that's what the original motion portends. Item (ii) in the above amendmended paragraph uses language straight out of the recommendations in the Issues report.

Thanks for considering it.

Tim