I agree with Tim and Jeff on this issue. ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:24 AM To: Tim Ruiz; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page I share Tim's view on this one as well. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:19 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page I am not convinced it is a good idea to do this as a JWG in this manner. I thought we were moving toward a GNSO WG, which of course are always open to all regardless of SO or AC affiliation. I think that is the quickest way to get Council agreement on this work AND to get it completed. JWGs are still controversial for many of us and we need to complete our work on that before initiating any further JWGs or CWGs. Tim

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page From: KnobenW@telekom.de Date: Thu, September 15, 2011 5:02 am To: <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com>, <rosemary.sinclair@unsw.edu.au>, <Glen@icann.org>, <council@gnso.icann.org>

Hi,

Maybe it helps to use a lower case "joint" (jWG) until the frame for (J)WGs is fixed - or is this even more subtle? If not I'd like to propose it as a friendly amendment and second the motion.

Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 16:24 An: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'GNSO Council List' Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Hi Rosemary,

The draft charter refers to a (GNSO) WG yet the motion refers to a JWG.

Am I missing an obvious subtlety here?

Thanks,

Jonathan

-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: 13 September 2011 21:38 To: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List Subject: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Hi all

I'd welcome any comments on the Motion I have proposed...

And a seconder for the Motion!

Cheers

Rosemary ________________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:17 AM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [council] Motions on the Wiki page

Dear Councillors,

Please find the motions proposed by: - Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and seconded by Stéphane van Gelder on the revision of the GNSO Council Operating Procedures Relating to Proxy Voting - Rosemary Sinclair to create a joint working group on consumer choice, competition and innovation - Zahid Jamil to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Recommendations

On the Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September +2011

Thank you. Kind regards,

Glen

Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6461 (20110913) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com