The ICANN68 GAC Communique is now out at https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann68-gac-communique As expected, there is no consensus advice, but "Issues of Importance to the GAC" has the following points: 1.Subsequent Rounds of New gTLDs 2.EPDP on gTLD Registration Data 3.DNS Abuse 4.IGO Protections 5.CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2 Implementation There is also a follow-up on previous advice on the EPDP, where the GAC reiterates that the advice to "Distinguish between legal and natural persons, allowing for public access to WHOIS data of legal entities, which are not in the remit of the GDPR” still stands and should be considered. Julf
Thanks Julf In light of there not being any formal advice should we formally provide a scorecard as we have done previously or not? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com https://blacknight.blog / http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park, Sleaty Road, Graiguecullen, Carlow, R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 28/06/2020, 09:15, "council on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote: The ICANN68 GAC Communique is now out at https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann68-gac-communique As expected, there is no consensus advice, but "Issues of Importance to the GAC" has the following points: 1.Subsequent Rounds of New gTLDs 2.EPDP on gTLD Registration Data 3.DNS Abuse 4.IGO Protections 5.CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2 Implementation There is also a follow-up on previous advice on the EPDP, where the GAC reiterates that the advice to "Distinguish between legal and natural persons, allowing for public access to WHOIS data of legal entities, which are not in the remit of the GDPR” still stands and should be considered. Julf _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I would suggest not given the lack of formal advice. --- James Gannon On 6/28/2020 11:40:21 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote: Thanks Julf In light of there not being any formal advice should we formally provide a scorecard as we have done previously or not? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com https://blacknight.blog / http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park, Sleaty Road, Graiguecullen, Carlow, R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 28/06/2020, 09:15, "council on behalf of Johan Helsingius" wrote: The ICANN68 GAC Communique is now out at https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann68-gac-communique As expected, there is no consensus advice, but "Issues of Importance to the GAC" has the following points: 1.Subsequent Rounds of New gTLDs 2.EPDP on gTLD Registration Data 3.DNS Abuse 4.IGO Protections 5.CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2 Implementation There is also a follow-up on previous advice on the EPDP, where the GAC reiterates that the advice to "Distinguish between legal and natural persons, allowing for public access to WHOIS data of legal entities, which are not in the remit of the GDPR” still stands and should be considered. Julf _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
On 28-06-2020 12:39, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
In light of there not being any formal advice should we formally provide a scorecard as we have done previously or not?
Formally we only respond to consensus advice. We are of course free to comment on whatever we want, but not sure there is any point in this case. Julf
participants (3)
-
james＠icann.guru -
Johan Helsingius -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight