Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/abb910660d58d9a1f7762b745c213799.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating principles addressing the following issues:
a. the current GNSO Operating Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
b. the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form Annex I of the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for Working Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council. These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led to full consensus in the Committee. Thanks Avri Doria Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ab591e1ac13b401b24e8145fdbe7c6fa.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thanks, Avri. Do you need a second for this motion? Maria On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating principles addressing the following issues:
a. the current GNSO Operating Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
b. the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form Annex I of
the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for Working Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led to full consensus in the Committee.
Thanks
Avri Doria Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/abb910660d58d9a1f7762b745c213799.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
It does need a second. avri On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:
Thanks, Avri.
Do you need a second for this motion?
Maria
On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote:
Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating principles addressing the following issues:
> a. the current GNSO Operating > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
b. the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form Annex I of the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for Working Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led to full consensus in the Committee.
Thanks
Avri Doria Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6d21d8b8f92f89e340dc88e5b6d6f3f6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
i’ll second it. i was on the SCI for most of these conversations. mikey On Mar 14, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
It does need a second.
avri
On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:
Thanks, Avri.
Do you need a second for this motion?
Maria
On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote:
Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating principles addressing the following issues:
> a. the current GNSO Operating > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
b. the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form Annex I of the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for Working Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led to full consensus in the Committee.
Thanks
Avri Doria Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
participants (3)
-
Avri Doria
-
Maria Farrell
-
Mike O'Connor