Following-up on Bruce's request -- would you please send your constituency's edits to the attached chart to the GNSO Secretariat <gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> by Friday, 2 March. Please let Glen know if you need more time. Again, this chart will be used to inform the Board Governance Committee and will help form a basis for selecting a few recommendations relating to major structural issues for public discussion in Lisbon. We are scheduling a public forum on Monday in Lisbon to discuss GNSO Improvements. Thanks. Denise Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development ICANN www.icann.org denise.michel@icann.org -------- Original Message -------- Hello All, I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the constituencies on the LSE report. Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation. The rankings are high, medium, low. This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the public forum. The recommendations have also been broken into the following categories: - participation - rules - structure - tools-support - working procedures Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections. The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board Governance Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations (such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon. The aim is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather than debate whether the website could be better. Regards, Bruce Tonkin