The proof will be in the pudding of what the Board does; not in the template-y responses. Hopefully, the Board does not let the GAC get away with busting up Consensus Advice into tiny little, nation sized pieces. That will be the end of predictability in the DNS. Best, Paul From: council-bounces@gnso.icann.org [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 3:55 AM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FW: [Correspondence] 2 Letters from Steve Crocker to James Bladel Councilors - Please see message below and docs attached, regarding the Board's review of GNSO responses to earlier GAC Communiques (Helsinki and Hyderabad), and their efforts to improve transparency in this process. Thank you -- J. ------------------ James Bladel GNSO Chair From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit@icann.org<mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 16:06 Subject: [Correspondence] 2 Letters from Steve Crocker to James Bladel Dear Marika, Please be so kind as to forward the attached (2) letters from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair of the GNSO. The letters are concerning the GNSO Review of the GAC Communiqués from Hyderabad and Helsinki, respectively, and will be published on the ICANN Correspondence page: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence. With thanks and warm regards, Wendy Profit ICANN – Manager, Board Operations ________________________________ ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.