Dear Justine, Thank you so much for reviewing the minutes! I have incorporated your suggested edits to the Google doc version, and the minutes will be published with the updates. Kind regards, Nathalie From: Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> Date: Saturday, 3 September 2022 at 03:53 To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> Cc: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>, "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 25 August 2022 Dear Nathalie, Thank you for circulating these draft minutes. I'd like to propose 2 amendments for consideration, as follows: Firstly, on pg 4, Item 4. COUNCIL VOTE - Initiation of the GNSO Guidance Process on Applicant Support The action items should appropriately refer to "Working Group" instead of "Steering Group" to reflect Philippe's request that the “Steering Group” structure mentioned in the motion be corrected to “Working Group”. Secondly, on pg 6, Item 6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Preparation for Joint Meetings at ICANN75 (with edits marked in blue) Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO, suggested in response clarified that ALAC is would not then be expecting Council to address the more detailed questions on the SubPro ODP, since as the whole community gets updates from the ODP team, as pointed out by Philippe. The topic suggested could be refined aims to trigger discussion about the GNSO Council's observations on the ODP Concept specifically, which is could be more informed through the GNSO Liaison to the SubPro ODP. It The nature of the discussion then would be more process-based, and not substance-based. So, I would ask that the paragraph be amended to read as: Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO, suggested in response that ALAC would not then be expecting Council to address the more detailed questions on the SubPro ODP, since the whole community gets updates from the ODP team, as pointed out by Philippe. The topic suggested could be refined to trigger discussion about the GNSO Council's observations on the ODP Concept specifically, which could be more informed through the GNSO Liaison to the SubPro ODP. The nature of the discussion then would be more process-based, and not substance-based. Thank you. Kind regards, Justine On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 04:58, Nathalie Peregrine via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Dear Councilors, Attached, please find the draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting held on Thursday, 25 August 2022. If there are no comments, these minutes will be published on the website as approved, according to the GNSO Rules of Procedure <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counc...> section 3.5 "If no objections are received within 10 days, the minutes will be deemed to have been approved for posting" on 07 September 2022. Thank you. Kind Regards, Nathalie _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.