RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
Avri, Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and new Councilors to Seoul. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid@dndrc.com> Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@cov.com>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@gnso.icann.org> I support this letter as well. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting hi, At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions. Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so. Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit. If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august. --- Letter to Kevin Wilson, I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization. The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and 'improvement.' Thank you Avri Doria for the GNSO Council
Hi, Well if the council agrees with the letter, I feel it is mandated. If there is division in the council on the sending of the letter then we have a different issue. a. On 29 Jul 2009, at 19:02, Tim Ruiz wrote:
Avri,
Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and new Councilors to Seoul.
Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid@dndrc.com> Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@cov.com>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@gnso.icann.org>
I support this letter as well.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
hi,
At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions.
Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so.
Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit. If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august.
---
Letter to Kevin Wilson,
I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization.
The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and 'improvement.'
Thank you Avri Doria for the GNSO Council
I agree with Tim here. That is I definitely do NOT agree with funding for both current and new Councillors to Seoul (at my potential inconvenience as my term is up prior to the meeting. What exactly is the justification again? Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 3:03 AM To: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting Avri, Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and new Councilors to Seoul. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid@dndrc.com> Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@cov.com>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@gnso.icann.org> I support this letter as well. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting hi, At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions. Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so. Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit. If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august. --- Letter to Kevin Wilson, I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization. The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and 'improvement.' Thank you Avri Doria for the GNSO Council
Hi Neither does NCUC. Bill On Jul 29, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
Avri,
Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and new Councilors to Seoul.
Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid@dndrc.com> Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@cov.com>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@gnso.icann.org>
I support this letter as well.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
hi,
At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions.
Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so.
Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit. If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august.
---
Letter to Kevin Wilson,
I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization.
The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and 'improvement.'
Thank you Avri Doria for the GNSO Council
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html ***********************************************************
participants (4)
-
Adrian Kinderis -
Avri Doria -
Tim Ruiz -
William Drake