Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)! Best regards, Marika From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Councilors – Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in Hyderabad. Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this Wednesday (26 OCT). For your convenience, Staff has prepared a centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint sessions. Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62399849[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D62399849&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=mSLKY6jrbFDpsgA48d3eey3RjCShJfdyNTvSeSVs2ck&s=9WukPQwvG1hAtmLdKAFzB4WfzWPMoxgmzUHXuPDTAXA&e=> Thank you, J. From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48 To: "jbladel@godaddy.com" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org>, "board-ops-team@icann.org" <Board-Ops-Team@icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Dear James, We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad! As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on the need to make the interaction between the Board and Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more effective for both the Groups and the Board. To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board. We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is Wednesday 26 October. We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD : 1. What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make the transition work for you? 2. What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to do to advance trust and confidence in what we do? Best, The Board Ops team
Thanks Marika. I think what the Board has asked are the very questions that needed to be asked. How will we decide who gets to speak at the Board/Council session? I have (unsurprisingly) thoughts to share and would like to participate. Best, Paul PS: Apologies if this has already been answered in an earlier email. I am a bit behind in my correspondence. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:58 AM To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)! Best regards, Marika From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> > on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com> > Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> > Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Councilors – Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in Hyderabad. Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this Wednesday (26 OCT). For your convenience, Staff has prepared a centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint sessions. Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62399849[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pag...> Thank you, J. From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org <mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org> > Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48 To: "jbladel@godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com> " <jbladel@godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com> > Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org <mailto:Glen@icann.org> >, "board-ops-team@icann.org <mailto:board-ops-team@icann.org> " <Board-Ops-Team@icann.org <mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org> >, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> > Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Dear James, We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad! As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on the need to make the interaction between the Board and Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more effective for both the Groups and the Board. To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board. We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is Wednesday 26 October. We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD : 1. What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make the transition work for you? 2. What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to do to advance trust and confidence in what we do? Best, The Board Ops team
Paul, some time has been set aside on day 2 (Friday 4 November) for prep for the meetings with the Board, ccNSO and GAC during which your question will presumably be covered. At the same time, people may want to already start the conversation on the mailing list? Best regards, Marika From: Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com> Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 8:32 AM To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Thanks Marika. I think what the Board has asked are the very questions that needed to be asked. How will we decide who gets to speak at the Board/Council session? I have (unsurprisingly) thoughts to share and would like to participate. Best, Paul PS: Apologies if this has already been answered in an earlier email. I am a bit behind in my correspondence. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:58 AM To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)! Best regards, Marika From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Councilors – Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in Hyderabad. Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this Wednesday (26 OCT). For your convenience, Staff has prepared a centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint sessions. Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62399849[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D62399849&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=mSLKY6jrbFDpsgA48d3eey3RjCShJfdyNTvSeSVs2ck&s=9WukPQwvG1hAtmLdKAFzB4WfzWPMoxgmzUHXuPDTAXA&e=> Thank you, J. From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org<mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org>> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48 To: "jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>>, "board-ops-team@icann.org<mailto:board-ops-team@icann.org>" <Board-Ops-Team@icann.org<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Dear James, We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad! As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on the need to make the interaction between the Board and Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more effective for both the Groups and the Board. To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board. We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is Wednesday 26 October. We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD : 1. What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make the transition work for you? 2. What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to do to advance trust and confidence in what we do? Best, The Board Ops team
James, Paul, all A couple of suggestions for consideration, that I think are somewhat linked to the questions we received from the Board. How do we make better use of our time at ICANN meetings: 1) in terms of scheduling; and 2) to provide more opportunities for Board/GAC/GNSO Council trilateral discussions on substantive topics of common interest. There should be a better process for developing the ICANN schedule and there certainly should be predictability in terms of Council meetings with the ICANN Board, ICANN CEO, the GAC and others. If we could agree on a standard schedule for meetings A & C, that may help relieve some of the angst that we and staff have to endure each time. On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an opportunity for open communication across the three groups. Thanks for considering. Donna Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc. Policy and Industry Affairs Manager Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin@neustar.biz<mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz> ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message. Follow Neustar: [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> [cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> [cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:33 AM To: 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org>; 'James M. Bladel' <jbladel@godaddy.com>; 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Thanks Marika. I think what the Board has asked are the very questions that needed to be asked. How will we decide who gets to speak at the Board/Council session? I have (unsurprisingly) thoughts to share and would like to participate. Best, Paul PS: Apologies if this has already been answered in an earlier email. I am a bit behind in my correspondence. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:58 AM To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)! Best regards, Marika From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Councilors – Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in Hyderabad. Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this Wednesday (26 OCT). For your convenience, Staff has prepared a centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint sessions. Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62399849[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D62399849&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=mSLKY6jrbFDpsgA48d3eey3RjCShJfdyNTvSeSVs2ck&s=9WukPQwvG1hAtmLdKAFzB4WfzWPMoxgmzUHXuPDTAXA&e=> Thank you, J. From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org<mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org>> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48 To: "jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>>, "board-ops-team@icann.org<mailto:board-ops-team@icann.org>" <Board-Ops-Team@icann.org<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Dear James, We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad! As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on the need to make the interaction between the Board and Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more effective for both the Groups and the Board. To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board. We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is Wednesday 26 October. We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD : 1. What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make the transition work for you? 2. What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to do to advance trust and confidence in what we do? Best, The Board Ops team
Hello Donna.
On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an opportunity for open communication across the three groups.
I completely agree the current – GAC-Board, GNSO-Board, GNSO-GAC combination of separate meetings sometimes spread over multiple ICANN meetings (ie Board might discuss a topic with GNSO in one public meeting, and discuss the same topic with GAC at a different public meeting) is dysfunctional. I would much prefer a structured GAC-GNSO-Board meeting on topics related to gTLDs, where the GAC has provided advice. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Thanks Bruce It was the subsequent procedures on new gTLDs PDP that I had in mind where I believe it would be beneficial to have structured discussions to either respond to, or perhaps even avoid, the situation where GAC advice is at odds with the PDP recommendations. The PDP WG is making progress on a number of topics and it may be possible to have trilateral sessions before finalization of the PDP recommendations and GAC advice, or vice versa. If we don't have the opportunity for such discussion, I fear there will be unnecessary and potentially lengthy delays. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:02 AM To: 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Hello Donna.
On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an opportunity for open communication across the three groups.
I completely agree the current – GAC-Board, GNSO-Board, GNSO-GAC combination of separate meetings sometimes spread over multiple ICANN meetings (ie Board might discuss a topic with GNSO in one public meeting, and discuss the same topic with GAC at a different public meeting) is dysfunctional. I would much prefer a structured GAC-GNSO-Board meeting on topics related to gTLDs, where the GAC has provided advice. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Personal View: I agree with Donna. We want to avoid the many unnecessary surprises and lengthy delays caused by the surprises that we experienced in Round 1 by GAC advice arriving well after implementation began. ICANN's herky jerky implementation of Round 1 made it a laughingstock in the business community and it needs to rebuild its image as a trusted business partner. Repeating the phenomenon of surprise GAC advice after applications have been filed will undo much of the good work of the last several years and I think the Board should aggressively manage that risk by bringing the GAC to the table early and keeping them at the table throughout the SubPro PDP. Best, Paul -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:30 AM To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Thanks Bruce It was the subsequent procedures on new gTLDs PDP that I had in mind where I believe it would be beneficial to have structured discussions to either respond to, or perhaps even avoid, the situation where GAC advice is at odds with the PDP recommendations. The PDP WG is making progress on a number of topics and it may be possible to have trilateral sessions before finalization of the PDP recommendations and GAC advice, or vice versa. If we don't have the opportunity for such discussion, I fear there will be unnecessary and potentially lengthy delays. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:02 AM To: 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics Hello Donna.
On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an opportunity for open communication across the three groups.
I completely agree the current – GAC-Board, GNSO-Board, GNSO-GAC combination of separate meetings sometimes spread over multiple ICANN meetings (ie Board might discuss a topic with GNSO in one public meeting, and discuss the same topic with GAC at a different public meeting) is dysfunctional. I would much prefer a structured GAC-GNSO-Board meeting on topics related to gTLDs, where the GAC has provided advice. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
+1 on the trilateral idea Donna. Particularly if a short and poignant (1-2 slide) introduction to those issues can be made to the meeting. GAC meetings take longest to warm up, using up to 20% of the time available. The drawback may be of course is again logistics: (a) the adequate size of the room and (b) adequate schedule, as the other bilateral meetings would have to be back to back (or front to front) to the joint one (1. GAC-Board, 2. GAC-Board-GNSO, 3. GAC -GNSO or something like that. Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 26 Oct 2016, at 17:31, Austin, Donna wrote:
James, Paul, all
A couple of suggestions for consideration, that I think are somewhat linked to the questions we received from the Board.
How do we make better use of our time at ICANN meetings: 1) in terms of scheduling; and 2) to provide more opportunities for Board/GAC/GNSO Council trilateral discussions on substantive topics of common interest.
There should be a better process for developing the ICANN schedule and there certainly should be predictability in terms of Council meetings with the ICANN Board, ICANN CEO, the GAC and others. If we could agree on a standard schedule for meetings A & C, that may help relieve some of the angst that we and staff have to endure each time.
On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an opportunity for open communication across the three groups.
Thanks for considering.
Donna
Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc. Policy and Industry Affairs Manager Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin@neustar.biz<mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz>
________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message. Follow Neustar: [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> [cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> [cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:33 AM To: 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org>; 'James M. Bladel' <jbladel@godaddy.com>; 'GNSO Council List' <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
Thanks Marika.
I think what the Board has asked are the very questions that needed to be asked. How will we decide who gets to speak at the Board/Council session? I have (unsurprisingly) thoughts to share and would like to participate.
Best, Paul
PS: Apologies if this has already been answered in an earlier email. I am a bit behind in my correspondence.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:58 AM To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)!
Best regards,
Marika
From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
Councilors –
Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in Hyderabad.
Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this Wednesday (26 OCT). For your convenience, Staff has prepared a centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint sessions. Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India.
From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org<mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld@icann.org>> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48 To: "jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>>, "board-ops-team@icann.org<mailto:board-ops-team@icann.org>" <Board-Ops-Team@icann.org<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
Dear James,
We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad!
As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on the need to make the interaction between the Board and Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more effective for both the Groups and the Board.
To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board.
We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is Wednesday 26 October.
We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting.
QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD :
1. What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make the transition work for you? 2. What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to do to advance trust and confidence in what we do?
Best,
The Board Ops team
participants (5)
-
Austin, Donna -
Bruce Tonkin -
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. -
Marika Konings -
Paul McGrady