FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review
Councilors – See below and attached for a message from Katrina Sataki, regarding the ccNSO’s participation in RDS-RT. Thank you, J. From: <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:14 To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve.crocker@board.icann.org> Cc: "goran.marby@icann.org" <goran.marby@icann.org>, "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>, 'Chris Disspain' <chris@disspain.uk>, 'Mike Silber' <mike.silber@board.icann.org>, SO-AC Chairs List <soac-chairs@icann.org> Subject: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Dear Steve: As, according to Section 4.6 (e) of the Bylaws, the Board caused the Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) review, I convey to you the ccNSO Council decision with respect to participation of the ccNSO in this review. As always, the ccNSO Council is available to explain its position. Kindest regards, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO Council
Thanks James. Do you have a sense of when the SO/AC Leaders will convene to finalize the slate of RDS Review Team members? Recognizing that the GNSO did not appoint any Registries or Registrars -- actual operators of RDS -- to the RDS Review Team (in the GNSO’s three ‘guaranteed’ slots), it’s very important we ensure there is actual operational experience in that group. With the ccNSO electing to sit this one out (the only other possible operators of RDS), the rest of the SO/AC Leaders should be convinced that having one registry rep and one registrar rep on the RT would not only be beneficial, but a necessity for an informed and balanced review team. I know this is covered in the Resolved Clause #2 from the motion approving our appointees, but I wanted to flag it and see if there’s any update. Thanks and regards, Keith From: council-bounces@gnso.icann.org [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 1:41 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Councilors – See below and attached for a message from Katrina Sataki, regarding the ccNSO’s participation in RDS-RT. Thank you, J. From: <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:14 To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve.crocker@board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>> Cc: "goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>" <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>, "ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>>, 'Chris Disspain' <chris@disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk>>, 'Mike Silber' <mike.silber@board.icann.org<mailto:mike.silber@board.icann.org>>, SO-AC Chairs List <soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Dear Steve: As, according to Section 4.6 (e) of the Bylaws, the Board caused the Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) review, I convey to you the ccNSO Council decision with respect to participation of the ccNSO in this review. As always, the ccNSO Council is available to explain its position. Kindest regards, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO Council
Hi Keith – Following up on your earlier request, the SO/AC leaders are trying to schedule a meeting next week (during GDD Summit, unfortunately) to finalize the slate of members to RDS-RT. Thanks— J. From: Keith Drazek <kdrazek@verisign.com> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 14:48 To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Thanks James. Do you have a sense of when the SO/AC Leaders will convene to finalize the slate of RDS Review Team members? Recognizing that the GNSO did not appoint any Registries or Registrars -- actual operators of RDS -- to the RDS Review Team (in the GNSO’s three ‘guaranteed’ slots), it’s very important we ensure there is actual operational experience in that group. With the ccNSO electing to sit this one out (the only other possible operators of RDS), the rest of the SO/AC Leaders should be convinced that having one registry rep and one registrar rep on the RT would not only be beneficial, but a necessity for an informed and balanced review team. I know this is covered in the Resolved Clause #2 from the motion approving our appointees, but I wanted to flag it and see if there’s any update. Thanks and regards, Keith From: council-bounces@gnso.icann.org [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 1:41 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Councilors – See below and attached for a message from Katrina Sataki, regarding the ccNSO’s participation in RDS-RT. Thank you, J. From: <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:14 To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve.crocker@board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>> Cc: "goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>" <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>, "ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>>, 'Chris Disspain' <chris@disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk>>, 'Mike Silber' <mike.silber@board.icann.org<mailto:mike.silber@board.icann.org>>, SO-AC Chairs List <soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Dear Steve: As, according to Section 4.6 (e) of the Bylaws, the Board caused the Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) review, I convey to you the ccNSO Council decision with respect to participation of the ccNSO in this review. As always, the ccNSO Council is available to explain its position. Kindest regards, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO Council
Ok, thanks James! Keith On May 4, 2017, at 9:04 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> wrote: Hi Keith – Following up on your earlier request, the SO/AC leaders are trying to schedule a meeting next week (during GDD Summit, unfortunately) to finalize the slate of members to RDS-RT. Thanks— J. From: Keith Drazek <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 14:48 To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>, GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: RE: [council] FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Thanks James. Do you have a sense of when the SO/AC Leaders will convene to finalize the slate of RDS Review Team members? Recognizing that the GNSO did not appoint any Registries or Registrars -- actual operators of RDS -- to the RDS Review Team (in the GNSO’s three ‘guaranteed’ slots), it’s very important we ensure there is actual operational experience in that group. With the ccNSO electing to sit this one out (the only other possible operators of RDS), the rest of the SO/AC Leaders should be convinced that having one registry rep and one registrar rep on the RT would not only be beneficial, but a necessity for an informed and balanced review team. I know this is covered in the Resolved Clause #2 from the motion approving our appointees, but I wanted to flag it and see if there’s any update. Thanks and regards, Keith From: council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 1:41 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] FW: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Councilors – See below and attached for a message from Katrina Sataki, regarding the ccNSO’s participation in RDS-RT. Thank you, J. From: <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:14 To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve.crocker@board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>> Cc: "goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>" <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>, "ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>>, 'Chris Disspain' <chris@disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk>>, 'Mike Silber' <mike.silber@board.icann.org<mailto:mike.silber@board.icann.org>>, SO-AC Chairs List <soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review Dear Steve: As, according to Section 4.6 (e) of the Bylaws, the Board caused the Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) review, I convey to you the ccNSO Council decision with respect to participation of the ccNSO in this review. As always, the ccNSO Council is available to explain its position. Kindest regards, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO Council
participants (2)
-
Drazek, Keith -
James M. Bladel