Councillors, Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin Leblond. The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make this deadline. I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report from the JAS group yet). I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO. Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may be wrong. Thanks and a great weekend to you all. Stéphane
I would prefer that it not go to the Board until we've reviewed and acted on. (I have no objection to our commenting via list, but we'd have to have a formal motion and we can't do that until the 19th, right?) If ALAC nonetheless forwards, the report should clearly indicate, via front cover black box (or something equally visually prominent), that the GNSO has not yet acted on the report (or received it, for that matter, if that's true at the time). K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:23 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: [council] JAS Councillors, Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin Leblond. The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make this deadline. I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report from the JAS group yet). I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO. Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may be wrong. Thanks and a great weekend to you all. Stéphane
I agree with Kristina here. I'd like to see it prior to the Board. Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Saturday, 7 May 2011 7:17 AM To: 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: RE: [council] JAS I would prefer that it not go to the Board until we've reviewed and acted on. (I have no objection to our commenting via list, but we'd have to have a formal motion and we can't do that until the 19th, right?) If ALAC nonetheless forwards, the report should clearly indicate, via front cover black box (or something equally visually prominent), that the GNSO has not yet acted on the report (or received it, for that matter, if that's true at the time). K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:23 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: [council] JAS Councillors, Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin Leblond. The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make this deadline. I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report from the JAS group yet). I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO. Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may be wrong. Thanks and a great weekend to you all. Stéphane
+1 Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Adrian Kinderis Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 03:29 An: Rosette, Kristina; 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Betreff: RE: [council] JAS I agree with Kristina here. I'd like to see it prior to the Board. Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Saturday, 7 May 2011 7:17 AM To: 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: RE: [council] JAS I would prefer that it not go to the Board until we've reviewed and acted on. (I have no objection to our commenting via list, but we'd have to have a formal motion and we can't do that until the 19th, right?) If ALAC nonetheless forwards, the report should clearly indicate, via front cover black box (or something equally visually prominent), that the GNSO has not yet acted on the report (or received it, for that matter, if that's true at the time). K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:23 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: [council] JAS Councillors, Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin Leblond. The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make this deadline. I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report from the JAS group yet). I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO. Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may be wrong. Thanks and a great weekend to you all. Stéphane
Thanks Kristina, and thanks for copying Olivier so that ALAC is aware of your request. Stéphane Le 6 mai 2011 à 23:16, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :
I would prefer that it not go to the Board until we've reviewed and acted on. (I have no objection to our commenting via list, but we'd have to have a formal motion and we can't do that until the 19th, right?)
If ALAC nonetheless forwards, the report should clearly indicate, via front cover black box (or something equally visually prominent), that the GNSO has not yet acted on the report (or received it, for that matter, if that's true at the time).
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:23 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Subject: [council] JAS
Councillors,
Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin Leblond.
The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make this deadline.
I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report from the JAS group yet).
I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO.
Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may be wrong.
Thanks and a great weekend to you all.
Stéphane
participants (4)
-
Adrian Kinderis -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Rosette, Kristina -
Stéphane Van Gelder