Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Rosemary and Wolf, I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report. Friendly amendments to the motion: 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas. 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar. 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely. Friendly amendments to the Charter: 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter." 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only. 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible." 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties." 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group." Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning. Thanks, Tim
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar..... Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
Rosemary, An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation". I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise? Many thanks! K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar..... Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
Hi Kristina- I can answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic: see: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6 Margie -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) Rosemary, An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation". I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise? Many thanks! K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar..... Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
I had raised this on a previous call. Would it be clearer if the language of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)? Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47 To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) Hi Kristina- I can answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic: see: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6 Margie -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) Rosemary, An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation". I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise? Many thanks! K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar..... Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
That language is in the first Whereas clause and the Charter Cheers, R Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 4:48 AM, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@dndrc.com> wrote:
I had raised this on a previous call. Would it be clearer if the language of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)?
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47 To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Hi Kristina-
I can answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic: see: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6
Margie
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Rosemary,
An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise?
Many thanks!
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
And the 1st Resolved clause!!! R Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 4:51 AM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@unsw.edu.au> wrote:
That language is in the first Whereas clause and the Charter
Cheers, R
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 4:48 AM, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@dndrc.com> wrote:
I had raised this on a previous call. Would it be clearer if the language of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)?
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47 To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Hi Kristina-
I can answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic: see: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6
Margie
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Rosemary,
An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise?
Many thanks!
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
I see it - got it! Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: 23 September 2011 01:52 To: Zahid Jamil Cc: Margie Milam; Rosette, Kristina; Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) That language is in the first Whereas clause and the Charter Cheers, R Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 4:48 AM, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@dndrc.com> wrote:
I had raised this on a previous call. Would it be clearer if the language of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)?
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47 To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Hi Kristina-
I can answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic: see: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6
Margie
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
Rosemary,
An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise?
Many thanks!
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
It's the Topic Title in the Board papers but the work is on definitions for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice as per the AOC Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 4:42 AM, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@cov.com> wrote:
Rosemary,
An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise?
Many thanks!
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
Got it, thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@unsw.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:48 PM To: Rosette, Kristina Cc: Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page) It's the Topic Title in the Board papers but the work is on definitions for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice as per the AOC Cheers Rosemary Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490 On 23/09/2011, at 4:42 AM, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@cov.com> wrote:
Rosemary,
An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation." Can you please advise?
Many thanks!
K
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair Director, External Relations Australian School of Business UNSW +61 413 734490
On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:
Rosemary and Wolf,
I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the timing of the report.
Friendly amendments to the motion:
1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
Friendly amendments to the Charter:
1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all interested parties."
5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate reasoning.
Thanks, Tim
participants (5)
-
Margie Milam -
Rosemary Sinclair -
Rosette, Kristina -
Tim Ruiz -
Zahid Jamil