Thanks Rubens. I understand that while we haven't done that sort of thing before, there is nothing prohibiting it. Seems like a sensible way forward to me... Best, Paul -----Original Message----- From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 8:42 AM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Consideration of options for Curative Rights Fellow Council members, I wonder if it's an option for the Council to accept recommendations #1 to #4 of the final report, and refer recommendation #5 to the RPM PDP, since there are concerns of that being or not in the WG charter / scope ? Rubens ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.