RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
I don't know. We didn't really try to figure that out. Perhaps NA (Not applicable) would be a better representation for feasibility, given our position. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Tue, December 16, 2008 11:40 am To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>, "Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> Thanks Tim. One question: what does zero (0) feasibility mean? Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:44 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
Attached. I also uploaded it to the Wiki site, but not sure if that was useful or not.
Tim
participants (1)
-
Tim Ruiz