Action items from yesterday's meeting
There are a few action items following yesterday's Council meeting. I have asked Staff to update the pending project list in the following way: - delete the travel drafting team. - delete the VI WG. - delete the FF item. On the rec6 (agenda item 5), we agreed that we would send a compilation of comments to the Board. Please ask your respective groups to send any comments they may wish to make by COB Monday Jan 24. On the consumer choice item (item 6), considering the resource issue that was identified, we agreed that Rosemary would liaise with Bruce and that we would then consider whether we should send a letter to the Board saying the GNSO does not have the resources to undertake this work. Rosemary has already reached out to Bruce. Rosemary, can I ask when you expect to get back to Council with an update? On agenda item 8.3, the Standing Committee for the 2 GNSO improvements Steering Committees, who would like to volunteer? On JAS, the Council Leadership suggests that our ALAC Liaison Alan Greenberg liaise with his group to see if our charter is acceptable to them. Would that be OK Alan? Thanks, Stéphane
Hi Stephane and everyone, I'll volunteer for the Standing Committee DT. Happy also to help with any bundling/summary of the various SG/Constituency reports/comments on the Rec 6 CWG stuff too. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To:GNSO Council <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 1/14/2011 8:50 AM Subject: [council] Action items from yesterday's meeting There are a few action items following yesterday's Council meeting. I have asked Staff to update the pending project list in the following way: - delete the travel drafting team. - delete the VI WG. - delete the FF item. On the rec6 (agenda item 5), we agreed that we would send a compilation of comments to the Board. Please ask your respective groups to send any comments they may wish to make by COB Monday Jan 24. On the consumer choice item (item 6), considering the resource issue that was identified, we agreed that Rosemary would liaise with Bruce and that we would then consider whether we should send a letter to the Board saying the GNSO does not have the resources to undertake this work. Rosemary has already reached out to Bruce. Rosemary, can I ask when you expect to get back to Council with an update? On agenda item 8.3, the Standing Committee for the 2 GNSO improvements Steering Committees, who would like to volunteer? On JAS, the Council Leadership suggests that our ALAC Liaison Alan Greenberg liaise with his group to see if our charter is acceptable to them. Would that be OK Alan? Thanks, Stéphane As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
Thanks Mary. Stéphane Le 14 janv. 2011 à 16:22, Mary Wong a écrit :
Hi Stephane and everyone,
I'll volunteer for the Standing Committee DT. Happy also to help with any bundling/summary of the various SG/Constituency reports/comments on the Rec 6 CWG stuff too.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To: GNSO Council <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 1/14/2011 8:50 AM Subject: [council] Action items from yesterday's meeting
There are a few action items following yesterday's Council meeting.
I have asked Staff to update the pending project list in the following way:
- delete the travel drafting team. - delete the VI WG. - delete the FF item.
On the rec6 (agenda item 5), we agreed that we would send a compilation of comments to the Board. Please ask your respective groups to send any comments they may wish to make by COB Monday Jan 24.
On the consumer choice item (item 6), considering the resource issue that was identified, we agreed that Rosemary would liaise with Bruce and that we would then consider whether we should send a letter to the Board saying the GNSO does not have the resources to undertake this work. Rosemary has already reached out to Bruce. Rosemary, can I ask when you expect to get back to Council with an update?
On agenda item 8.3, the Standing Committee for the 2 GNSO improvements Steering Committees, who would like to volunteer?
On JAS, the Council Leadership suggests that our ALAC Liaison Alan Greenberg liaise with his group to see if our charter is acceptable to them. Would that be OK Alan?
Thanks,
Stéphane
As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
Hi Stéphane, I'll volunteer for the drafting team on the Standing committee. In addition I'll cooperate on the improvement of the proxy voting item - I communicated that already to Bill. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 14:48 An: GNSO Council Betreff: [council] Action items from yesterday's meeting There are a few action items following yesterday's Council meeting. I have asked Staff to update the pending project list in the following way: - delete the travel drafting team. - delete the VI WG. - delete the FF item. On the rec6 (agenda item 5), we agreed that we would send a compilation of comments to the Board. Please ask your respective groups to send any comments they may wish to make by COB Monday Jan 24. On the consumer choice item (item 6), considering the resource issue that was identified, we agreed that Rosemary would liaise with Bruce and that we would then consider whether we should send a letter to the Board saying the GNSO does not have the resources to undertake this work. Rosemary has already reached out to Bruce. Rosemary, can I ask when you expect to get back to Council with an update? On agenda item 8.3, the Standing Committee for the 2 GNSO improvements Steering Committees, who would like to volunteer? On JAS, the Council Leadership suggests that our ALAC Liaison Alan Greenberg liaise with his group to see if our charter is acceptable to them. Would that be OK Alan? Thanks, Stéphane
Thanks Wolf. Stéphane Le 17 janv. 2011 à 21:38, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> a écrit :
Hi Stéphane,
I'll volunteer for the drafting team on the Standing committee. In addition I'll cooperate on the improvement of the proxy voting item - I communicated that already to Bill.
Regards Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 14:48 An: GNSO Council Betreff: [council] Action items from yesterday's meeting
There are a few action items following yesterday's Council meeting.
I have asked Staff to update the pending project list in the following way:
- delete the travel drafting team. - delete the VI WG. - delete the FF item.
On the rec6 (agenda item 5), we agreed that we would send a compilation of comments to the Board. Please ask your respective groups to send any comments they may wish to make by COB Monday Jan 24.
On the consumer choice item (item 6), considering the resource issue that was identified, we agreed that Rosemary would liaise with Bruce and that we would then consider whether we should send a letter to the Board saying the GNSO does not have the resources to undertake this work. Rosemary has already reached out to Bruce. Rosemary, can I ask when you expect to get back to Council with an update?
On agenda item 8.3, the Standing Committee for the 2 GNSO improvements Steering Committees, who would like to volunteer?
On JAS, the Council Leadership suggests that our ALAC Liaison Alan Greenberg liaise with his group to see if our charter is acceptable to them. Would that be OK Alan?
Thanks,
Stéphane
participants (3)
-
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Mary Wong -
Stéphane Van Gelder