Review of CCWG - ACCT Report

Colleagues - Following up from our most recent call, and the actions associated with review of the next Draft Report from the CCWG-Accountabilty WG, it would be great if we can get out in front of any concerns that might be raised by the GNSO Community or the Council. With this in mind, could we ask each SG/C to designate one Councilor to report back to the Council list with: * Efforts (planned or underway) in their SG/C to review & discuss the Draft Report * The expected time frame for completing the review, and any deadlines for the SG to raise concerns * Any issues or topics arising from this review that need to be discussed by the Council, and/or included in our response back to the CCWG. The Draft Report is expected to be published on 30 Nov, with the comment period closing on 21 Dec. No question that this is an extremely tight schedule, and hopefully this approach will allow us to gather topics for discussion on our next call on 17 Dec. Thanks- J.

Hi James, Thanks for getting out in front of this. I've been designated as be the NCSG Councillor reporting to the Council list on all things CCWG-ACCT. As we approach the one year anniversary of the very first CCWG-ACCT meeting (December 9th) it truly is amazing how much the CCWG has accomplished, and the amount of detail and effort that has gone into the third draft report is extraordinary. Thanks go out to so many from the GNSO who have dedicated large portions of their lives this past year getting the CCWG to this point. Much has been done, even more still needs to be done, and as a charting organisation the input we'll be sending to the CCWG in response to the third draft report is crucial to the success of this effort. In response to your bullet points: * Efforts (planned or underway) in their SG/C to review & discuss the Draft Report Substantive discussion of the specifics of the proposal has begun on the various mailing lists of the NCSG and of it's constituent parts (NCUC/NPOC). The NCSG Policy Committee is currently organising itself to produce it's own public comment by the December 21st deadline. Several of our organisational and individual members have indicated that they will be filing separate comments. We will be having a Webinar on the report next week and a large portion of the NCSG policy call on December 15th is expected to be devoted to the draft report. * The expected time frame for completing the review, and any deadlines for the SG to raise concerns Frankly, given the short amount of time allowed for public comment the entire concept of a time frame is almost nonsensical here. Twenty one days is insufficient time to thoroughly respond to the myriad of issues raised in the draft report. As many of our Members (NCSG's 500 Members come from over 100 different countries) are not native English speakers their time frame for public comment is effectively reduced to nine days. As such, our review of the third draft report is ongoing and I expect will continue to the final public comment deadline of December 21st, and beyond. * Any issues or topics arising from this review that need to be discussed by the Council, and/or included in our response back to the CCWG. As noted, our review is ongoing. I do expect substantial progress to have been made by our NCSG policy call on December 15th and I, along with my fellow NCSG Councillors, will be prepared to discuss our concerns and conclusions, to date, on the December 17th Council call. There obviously is much work to be done by Council between now and the December 21st public comment deadline. To the extent it would be helpful, I'm happy to volunteer for any tasks that may need to be done on this during the coming few weeks. It might upset Santa Claus a bit but something tells me a split root would upset him even more! Despite the time constraints let's do our best to give the CCWG some quality input worthy of the GNSO's talented and dynamic membership. Kind Regards, Ed Morris The Draft Report is expected to be published on 30 Nov, with the comment period closing on 21 Dec. No question that this is an extremely tight schedule, and hopefully this approach will allow us to gather topics for discussion on our next call on 17 Dec. Thanks— J.

Thanks James. The RySG and RrSG held a joint teleconference today to discuss the CCWG-Accountability's Version 3 proposal and to map out next steps for consideration and possible comment. We are working now to develop our comments and any position statements on the proposal. I expect this work will be completed prior to the next GNSO Council call on December 17. Regards, Keith (RySG) From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 11:40 AM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [council] Review of CCWG - ACCT Report Colleagues - Following up from our most recent call, and the actions associated with review of the next Draft Report from the CCWG-Accountabilty WG, it would be great if we can get out in front of any concerns that might be raised by the GNSO Community or the Council. With this in mind, could we ask each SG/C to designate one Councilor to report back to the Council list with: * Efforts (planned or underway) in their SG/C to review & discuss the Draft Report * The expected time frame for completing the review, and any deadlines for the SG to raise concerns * Any issues or topics arising from this review that need to be discussed by the Council, and/or included in our response back to the CCWG. The Draft Report is expected to be published on 30 Nov, with the comment period closing on 21 Dec. No question that this is an extremely tight schedule, and hopefully this approach will allow us to gather topics for discussion on our next call on 17 Dec. Thanks- J.
participants (3)
-
Drazek, Keith
-
Edward Morris
-
James M. Bladel