PDP-WT Final Report
Dear All, On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore. With best regards, Marika
All, Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea. The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166 ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report Dear All, On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 - 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore. With best regards, Marika
I second. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Neuman, Jeff Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011 21:33 An: Council GNSO Betreff: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final PDP-WT Report All, Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea. The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166 ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report Dear All, On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 - 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore. With best regards, Marika
Thanks to you both. This has been added to the agenda for our June 9 meeting. Stéphane Le 31 mai 2011 à 21:57, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> a écrit :
I second.
Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Neuman, Jeff Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011 21:33 An: Council GNSO Betreff: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final PDP-WT Report
All,
Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea.
The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report
Dear All,
On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore.
With best regards,
Marika
Jeff, In anticipation of our discussions on this during our meeting, I have a question which I missed the first time I read this report, before it was amended to take into account the latest comment period. I see the group recommends that the definition of a GNSO Supermajority be changed to include what the group calls "the original meaning of a GNSO Supermajority". I was wondering if the group had also considered changing the voting requirements to approve a request for an issues report, which currently has a 25% threshold, the lowest threshold we have? Also, can you tell me if a redline of the latest report exists, showing the changes made in response to the latest batch of comments received? That would be of help in understanding the changes the group has seen fit to make as a result of the comments. Once again, congratulations to both the PPSC, the PDP-WT and their respective Staff support for the quality of this work. Thanks, Stéphane Le 31 mai 2011 à 21:32, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
All,
Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea.
The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report
Dear All,
On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore.
With best regards,
Marika <Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report - 30 May 2011.doc>
Thanks for your questions Stephane. Please note that the latest redline of the report can be found at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/2.+PDP-WT+Documents+%28Drafts+-.... I have also enclosed a copy of our "Public Comments Review Tool" which shows summaries of the comments received and the PDP-WT's discussion of those items and where we came out on those issues. I just realized the announcement did not link to these docs. Perhaps we can add those? With respect to your question on the existing threshold to approve a request for an issue report, the PDP-WT came to the conclusion that other than the clarification you cite below, we did not want to change any of the existing thresholds at this point in time as we felt like this should be addressed as part of the overall functioning of the GNSO during its next scheduled review. Although certain members of the group had their own opinions as to whether these should be changed, the group ultimately felt like there was just not enough data on PDPs commenced under the new structure to make a good assessment as to whether they needed to be changed. We added a couple of thresholds to cover things that were not previously addressed (like approval of a charter - which technically is not required now). I hope that helps. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166 ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:30 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final PDP-WT Report Jeff, In anticipation of our discussions on this during our meeting, I have a question which I missed the first time I read this report, before it was amended to take into account the latest comment period. I see the group recommends that the definition of a GNSO Supermajority be changed to include what the group calls "the original meaning of a GNSO Supermajority". I was wondering if the group had also considered changing the voting requirements to approve a request for an issues report, which currently has a 25% threshold, the lowest threshold we have? Also, can you tell me if a redline of the latest report exists, showing the changes made in response to the latest batch of comments received? That would be of help in understanding the changes the group has seen fit to make as a result of the comments. Once again, congratulations to both the PPSC, the PDP-WT and their respective Staff support for the quality of this work. Thanks, Stéphane Le 31 mai 2011 à 21:32, Neuman, Jeff a écrit : All, Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea. The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166 ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report Dear All, On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 - 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore. With best regards, Marika <Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report - 30 May 2011.doc>
Very helpful, thanks Jeff. Stéphane Le 1 juin 2011 à 13:04, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
Thanks for your questions Stephane. Please note that the latest redline of the report can be found at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/2.+PDP-WT+Documents+%28Drafts+-.... I have also enclosed a copy of our “Public Comments Review Tool” which shows summaries of the comments received and the PDP-WT’s discussion of those items and where we came out on those issues. I just realized the announcement did not link to these docs. Perhaps we can add those?
With respect to your question on the existing threshold to approve a request for an issue report, the PDP-WT came to the conclusion that other than the clarification you cite below, we did not want to change any of the existing thresholds at this point in time as we felt like this should be addressed as part of the overall functioning of the GNSO during its next scheduled review. Although certain members of the group had their own opinions as to whether these should be changed, the group ultimately felt like there was just not enough data on PDPs commenced under the new structure to make a good assessment as to whether they needed to be changed. We added a couple of thresholds to cover things that were not previously addressed (like approval of a charter – which technically is not required now).
I hope that helps. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:30 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final PDP-WT Report
Jeff,
In anticipation of our discussions on this during our meeting, I have a question which I missed the first time I read this report, before it was amended to take into account the latest comment period.
I see the group recommends that the definition of a GNSO Supermajority be changed to include what the group calls "the original meaning of a GNSO Supermajority". I was wondering if the group had also considered changing the voting requirements to approve a request for an issues report, which currently has a 25% threshold, the lowest threshold we have?
Also, can you tell me if a redline of the latest report exists, showing the changes made in response to the latest batch of comments received? That would be of help in understanding the changes the group has seen fit to make as a result of the comments.
Once again, congratulations to both the PPSC, the PDP-WT and their respective Staff support for the quality of this work.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 31 mai 2011 à 21:32, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
All,
Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report. The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment period. Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the community in response to previous comments. In addition, given the significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a good idea.
The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July meeting.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report
Dear All,
On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore.
With best regards,
Marika <Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report - 30 May 2011.doc>
<PDP-WT - Public Comments Review Tool - Proposed Final Report - Updated 24 May 2011.pdf>
participants (4)
-
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Marika Konings -
Neuman, Jeff -
Stéphane Van Gelder