Dear Councilors, The attached document integrates the suggestion from Maxim. Best, Steve On 1/8/20, 9:48 PM, "Maxim Alzoba" <m.alzoba@gmail.com> wrote: Hello all I think that in this version we miss an output from RySG once more (it was sent twice so far). We need to change this bit to include word operationally (technically means that something could be done on a networking and computer level, and does not refer to business operations or processes). So (iv) The IGO Work Track shall consult with ICANN org and Contracted Parties to ensure that its draft final recommendations are technically feasible. To be (iv) The IGO Work Track shall consult with ICANN org and Contracted Parties to ensure that its draft final recommendations are operationally and technically feasible. ⁣Maxim Alzoba​ On 9 Jan 2020, 04:08, at 04:08, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote: >Dear Councilors, > > > >Pam pointed out to me that it is very confusing reviewing the redline >that was circulated on the 7th. I believe the reason for that is >because the redline has comments from the small team and Council >leadership, suggesting whether the added/deleted text should be >accepted or not. The clean version distributed on 18 December, and >discussed on the subsequent Council meeting, followed the guidance from >the small team and Council leadership to accept or reject the proposed >changes, in order to generate a clean version. > > > >I’ve since created a redlined version of that 18 December version, >where you will find a single change on page 3; this should more clearly >show the integration of feedback since the topic was last discussed on >the 19 December Council meeting. Hopefully this provides some clarity >if you’ve experienced confusion in reviewing the 7 January version. If >this is still confusing, I would not be surprised, and apologies in >advance! > > > >Best, > >Steve > > > >From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "Drazek, >Keith via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> >Reply-To: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com> >Date: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 10:15 AM >To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> >Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> >Subject: [council] RPM Charter Addendum -- Final Draft > > > >Hi all, > > > >Following our discussions during the last Council meeting, and looking >ahead to our January meeting, attached is the final draft of the RPM >PDP charter addendum incorporating the IGO protections work team. >Please review and advise if you have any comments by COB Thursday. We >will be posting a motion in support of this early next week so we can >vote during our January council meeting. > > > >Thanks and regards, > >Keith > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >council mailing list >council@gnso.icann.org >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council > >_______________________________________________ >By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy >(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p... ) and the website Terms of Service >(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t... ). You can visit the Mailman link >above to change your membership status or configuration, including >unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery >altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.