Hi, Chuck and I have been trying to set out the high level agenda through the LA meeting. I have enclosed a draft of that. At best this is a rough indicator as events might conspire to make it otherwise. But as part of the effort to make our work more predicatable, I figured we should try. You will notice that I have included a second interim teleconference on Sept 23rd and 2 days of face-to-face meetings in the schedule. Given the amount of important work before the council, and because I want to make sure we have enough time to give topics their due, I think we need these meetings. Of course we still need to decide as a council whether they will actually happen. As always, comments and corrections are most welcome. thanks a. ---- 30 Aug - Report from Whois group and discussion on issues and how to proceed. Update on status of Registry Transfer work 6 sept - Discussion and vote on New gTLD recommendations Decision on GA-list issue related to by-law obligations for email lists 23 sept (tentative) - Report from IDN-ccTLD group and discussion Follow up on Registry Transfer work Discuss agenda for LA public meeting 11 oct - Intergovernmental Organization Dispute Resolutuion Process (IGO-DRP) Report and decsion on next steps Domain Tasting report and decision on next step 27 oct (f2f) - Whois recommendation discussion/decisions IDN-ccTLD report followup as necessary Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) discussion GAC meeting prep 28 oct (f2f)- GNSO reform discussion (assumes update from board Governance WG) Final prep for meeting especially Monday workshop on new gTLD recommendations Any pending issues not closed or emergent issues
Thanks Avri, I find this very helpful. I am also curious to know about the apparently ongoing review of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement, what role is Council envisioned to have in that review and when? Mike Rodenbaugh -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:37 AM To: GNSO Council Subject: [council] High level agenda through 28 October Hi, Chuck and I have been trying to set out the high level agenda through the LA meeting. I have enclosed a draft of that. At best this is a rough indicator as events might conspire to make it otherwise. But as part of the effort to make our work more predicatable, I figured we should try. You will notice that I have included a second interim teleconference on Sept 23rd and 2 days of face-to-face meetings in the schedule. Given the amount of important work before the council, and because I want to make sure we have enough time to give topics their due, I think we need these meetings. Of course we still need to decide as a council whether they will actually happen. As always, comments and corrections are most welcome. thanks a. ---- 30 Aug - Report from Whois group and discussion on issues and how to proceed. Update on status of Registry Transfer work 6 sept - Discussion and vote on New gTLD recommendations Decision on GA-list issue related to by-law obligations for email lists 23 sept (tentative) - Report from IDN-ccTLD group and discussion Follow up on Registry Transfer work Discuss agenda for LA public meeting 11 oct - Intergovernmental Organization Dispute Resolutuion Process (IGO-DRP) Report and decsion on next steps Domain Tasting report and decision on next step 27 oct (f2f) - Whois recommendation discussion/decisions IDN-ccTLD report followup as necessary Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) discussion GAC meeting prep 28 oct (f2f)- GNSO reform discussion (assumes update from board Governance WG) Final prep for meeting especially Monday workshop on new gTLD recommendations Any pending issues not closed or emergent issues
Hi, On 28 aug 2007, at 18.20, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
Thanks Avri, I find this very helpful.
I am also curious to know about the apparently ongoing review of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement, what role is Council envisioned to have in that review and when?
Ross will be giving the council a status update this week. I think that the next deliverable includes some documentation and recommendations. The council will have to review and discuss the information that Ross brings to the council and then determine what happens next. thanks a.
participants (3)
-
Avri Doria
-
Avri Doria
-
Mike Rodenbaugh