![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/abb910660d58d9a1f7762b745c213799.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
thee are supposed to be two motions. In my last ruhed email I repeated the one that is n the wiki. The two motions tabled last meeting until this one are:
Whereas: - ICANN has undertaken a lengthy consultative process related to amending the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA); - The parties have arrived at a set of amendments that are generally thought to be worthy of inclusion in the RAA;
Resolve: The GNSO Council supports the attached RAA amendments and recommends to the Board that they be adopted.
Second motion:
Whereas: - The GNSO Council has recommended that the RAA amendments developed by the ICANN community be adopted; - There is a belief that additional amendments to the RAA may be required; - The Registrar Constituency is open to continuing the dialogue about future changes to the RAA;
Resolve: The GNSO Council calls on ICANN to establish a consultative process by which to review the superset of community-suggested RAA issues and amendments not addressed in the present set of amendments and to work with Registrars to develop a procedure for proposing additional amendments in the future.
participants (1)
-
Avri Doria