Bylaw revisions - Article VII
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2e9013612fada8dd659f99573729d41c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
We are working on the proposed Bylaw revisions for Articles X and XX, and have been promised revisions related to Annex A, but unless I missed it, we have had no discussion at all about Article VII, regarding how Nominating Committee delegates are selected. Since the seven GNSO delegates are tied to the current Constituencies (2 for the BC and 1 for each other Constituency), this would surely have to change in the new model. At first glance, this is potentially a controversial issue. Alan
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4467d6439e53ca632c96d571798107d9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
As a reminder the two BC delegates to the nom com are to ensure inclusion of representation from large and small business users. That breadth of representation will not change within in the BC. Philip
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b90048f2bfa1fb043625de7955dfdda6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Good point Alan. This sounds to be like an issue that may need to be considered by the GNSO Operations and/or the GNSO Constituency/Stakeholder Group WTs under the OSC, so I cc'd the chairs of those teams. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:23 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
We are working on the proposed Bylaw revisions for Articles X and XX, and have been promised revisions related to Annex A, but unless I missed it, we have had no discussion at all about Article VII, regarding how Nominating Committee delegates are selected. Since the seven GNSO delegates are tied to the current Constituencies (2 for the BC and 1 for each other Constituency), this would surely have to change in the new model. At first glance, this is potentially a controversial issue.
Alan
participants (3)
-
Alan Greenberg
-
Gomes, Chuck
-
Philip Sheppard